Live data from Hacker News

Grok3 Launch [video]

x.com

901–910 of 1001 posts

Re: Grok3 Launch [video]

#901

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What do we do to assess the intelligence of these models after they are smarter than any human? From the kinds of questions it's answering seems like they are almost there. Do we have a way to tell if one model is smarter than another at that point?

There are things besides measuring intelligence, like humor. Currently, all the bots struggle with making jokes.

What you probably mean is puzzle solving intelligence. Humor is a form of intelligence. It's just not only about intelligence - it's also about values, and context, for instance. But all this reflects a form of intelligence. Neverthless, intelligence shouldn't be ranked, at least not in the way we are used to talk about it.

Re: Grok3 Launch [video]

#902

[flagged]

What's wrong with DOGE? How is eliminating bureaucracy/spending a bad thing? This has been done about 100 years ago, research on what happened after. It feels like people that scream the loudest are the ones leaching from the system.

Eliminating waste is a great idea. But it’s unclear that that’s all he’s doing, it’s unclear how or how well it’s being done, he’s brought in people without security review (which means they, and the systems they are opening up and creating, can be more easily compromised by our enemies), and he has enormous conflicts of interest.

Re: Grok3 Launch [video]

#903

[flagged]

What's wrong with DOGE? How is eliminating bureaucracy/spending a bad thing? This has been done about 100 years ago, research on what happened after. It feels like people that scream the loudest are the ones leaching from the system.

I don't think that's what DOGE is doing. Seems extremely vindictive and ideological in the way it's acting and time will tell but I would not be surprised if it ends costing the taxpayers more in the long run.

Re: Grok3 Launch [video]

#904

[flagged]

What's wrong with DOGE? How is eliminating bureaucracy/spending a bad thing? This has been done about 100 years ago, research on what happened after. It feels like people that scream the loudest are the ones leaching from the system.

What's wrong? Let me count the ways.

- Much of the spending they're eliminating is good and important (E.g. USAID).

- The way they're cutting is reckless (They accidentally fired nuclear safety workers).

- Many of the workers are Musk sycophants, who were hired from Twitter/Tesla/SpaceX.

- There's a tremendous conflict of interest in this agency being run by a massive government contractor (NASA and the military are both avid SpaceX customers).

- The workers are not experienced with the data they're working with, and misinterpret it constantly in public before verifying it.

- Despite claims of "transparency", Musk asserted that it was illegal to publish the names of his employees.

- Their one product, their government spending portal, is a worse version of a spending portal which already exists, and they didn't even secure their database.

- They say they "use AI" for their decisions. Which AI? Where is confidential data going?

- Do the staff have security clearance?

Re: Grok3 Launch [video]

#906

[flagged]

> My question is how may of you are actually willing to give Musk more money after the questionable, legal, and ethical behavior he's exhibited while working for DOGE. Oh yes, far better to give to alt-man, google or Facebook - those are morally responsible companies!

Far better to give elected representatives this responsibility, IMHO. This is bizarre. There are a lot of billionaires jockeying for influence and resources here. It's almost like a free for all. Musk could also use his position to force Sam Altman's hand in the acquisition of OpenAI, https://www.wsj.com/tech/elon-musk-sam-altman-relationship-6.... I'm not interested in either party, but it's clear there are huge conflicts of interests here. Musk also expressed disappointment when not getting a piece of this pie, https://www.axios.com/2025/01/22/stargate-elon-musk-trump-al.... I've also read more concerning material regarding JD Vances connections with Peter Theil and their interests in side lining the constitution for some other efforts prepping for "networked states", https://www.nytimes.com/2025/01/18/magazine/curtis-yarvin-in.... Much of this is impossible to follow closely. Like I said, this administration seems to be flooding the zone with shit to distract others from what their real intent is. I think it's worth vetting and questioning positions in government, you can't just blindly trust these ppl. Something seems really off. I say question everything at this point. I don't trust billionaires to fix the worlds problems. Democracy and the constitution should be upheld and well guarded.

Re: Grok3 Launch [video]

#907

[flagged]

Most people, based on my experience, would rather support Elon Musk than support a strategy recommended by an individual who believes that the MSM should be trusted.

Not to mention that most of your sources to support your points are from far left MSM sources.

Your reasoning is exactly why there is so much support for Elon Musk. You probably made more Elon Musk fans just by your post.

Most people seem to believe the government is broken and MSM is a huge reason for this.

Re: Grok3 Launch [video]

#908

[flagged]

I will gladly give him more money. I have no vendetta against him or his actions, you're free to do as you please but don't enforce your political agenda on everyone.

Same. I support everything that's going on at DOGE. There's a certain type around here that needs to get used to the fact that their political views do not enjoy industry wide hegemony.

Re: Grok3 Launch [video]

#909

[flagged]

DOGE has revealed that 400 million are rookie numbers when it comes to phony deals. Forcing the government to spend money has always been the infinite money glitch. On one side you have healthcare and pharma companies making sure everything is excessively overpriced, then they lobby the government to make sure everyone has government sponsored healthcare, i.e.: turn all tax revenue into healthcare revenue. Then they…

Specifics are the enemy of populism:

- healthcare and pharma is overpriced because of information frictions, institutional supply constraints (this mostly means strict immigration controls), and people just really want healthcare relative to other wants! See: https://www.reddit.com/r/badeconomics/comments/1gsezga/comme...

also biden made insulin capped at a price so.

- mass incarceration is a SUPER populist thing! How many times do we hear "we need to be tough on crime"? This sure seems like the voters behind it, it's not like people are clamoring for shorter sentences.

- Indeed, our military is expensive partially because we require domestic production and have to pay really high domestic costs, and partially because the way the US fights war places a SUPER high value on human life. Desert storm was both expensive and only resulted in ~200 coalition deaths to take down the world's 4th largest military, whereas Russia has made it not very far into ukraine and taken over 200k deaths (and it hasn't even been substantially cheaper to boot, just a bit cheaper).

- The tax loopholes exist and are bad, although I challenge you to give me specific loopholes that cost high billions and should obviously be repealed in a way that both constituents are clamoring for and the representatives don't actually do. I don't think they exist.

You know what does actually degrade the fiber of the country? The richest person in the world taking personal control over every payment and arbitrarily destroying institutional knowledge by firing every government employee he has control over or who stands up to him. But no, instead we get "he's saving money" when (see the earlier comment from me) we're not even making outlays go down! A script kiddie who randomly rewrites lines into bad assembly while destroying the build system isn't a perf eng, they're a danger.

Re: Grok3 Launch [video]

#910

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I work, and the fact that my tax money is going into a black hole makes my blood boil. God bless Musk and DOGE for what they do. Here is just one headline from today, The Elon Musk-led Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) on Monday revealed its finding that $4.7 trillion in disbursements by the US Treasury are "almost impossible" to trace, thanks to a rampant disregard for the basic accounting practice of using…

Will you go on the record and say that $4.7T in a year is fraudulent or misspent? I want to be crystal clear with what you're insinuating, because that's a massive amount of money, easily the biggest fraud of all time by a factor of almost 30.

"insinuate -- suggest or hint (something bad or reprehensible) in an indirect and unpleasant way."

I am not "insinuating" but saying that I would like to know where my money goes. If you pay taxes, would not you?

Post reply on HN