Earlier quoted context omitted.
AI is taking marketshare from search slowly. More and more people will go to the AI to find things and not a search bar. It will be a crisis for Google in 5-10 years.
Source?
my own analysis
Meta Llama 3
901–910 of 965 posts
Re: Meta Llama 3
#902Earlier quoted context omitted.
> I think it's laughable to believe an LLM will be the tool that makes a difference If you think it's "laughable", what do you think tools are for? Every tool makes some difference, that's why they get used . The better models are already at the level of a (free) everything-intern, and it's very easy to use them for high-level control of robotics. > getting info on how to do this stuff is not the barrier you think it…
Uh oh -- we should ban this secondary school thing
Interesting thing I've heard about humans, very bad at noticing conjunctions such as "but".
Wonder if it's true?
Re: Meta Llama 3
#903Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Turning everything into some sort of theological debate takes away a lot of credit that Meta deserves. It's not theological, it's the misuse of a specific legal definition that we all have interest in maintaining. "Freely available models" or "open license" are accurate. Other companies keeping things for themselves doesn't warp reality, or the existing definitions we use to describe it. Giving them the credit they…
Hate to break it to you but there’s a thousand court cases a day precisely because “specific legal definition” is a surprisingly flexible concept depending on context. Likewise when new technologies emerge it often requires reappraisal and interpretation of existing laws, even if that reappraisal is simply extending the old law to the new context.
This isn't a problem with interpretation, as I would guess those are. This is a term that clearly describes requirements for a category, with the these models licenses purposefully and directly excluding themselves from that category.
Re: Meta Llama 3
#904Earlier quoted context omitted.
I swear, this feels like people get paid to write positive stuff about him? Have you forgotten his shitty leadership and practices around data and lock-ins?
Yes how dare different people have different opinions about different people? It's almost as if we all should be a monolithic voice that agrees with you.
The thread was suspiciously positive, like almost exclusive. Your comment adds nothing to the discussion, you're just snarky and nothing else. So get off my back
Re: Meta Llama 3
#905They've got a console for it as well, https://www.meta.ai/ And announcing a lot of integration across the Meta product suite, https://about.fb.com/news/2024/04/meta-ai-assistant-built-wi... Neglected to include comparisons against GPT-4-Turbo or Claude Opus, so I guess it's far from being a frontier model. We'll see how it fares in the LLM Arena.
Also added Llama 3 70B to our coding copilot https://www.double.bot if anyone wants to try it for coding within their IDE and not just chat in the console
That was fast! I've really been enjoying Double, thanks for your work.
Re: Meta Llama 3
#906Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don't know Dwarkesh but I despise Lex Fridman. I don't know how a man that lacks the barest modicum of charisma has propelled himself to helming a high-profile, successful podcast. It's not like he tends to express interesting or original thoughts to make up for his paucity of presence. It's bizarre. Maybe I'll check out Dwarkesh, but even seeing him mentioned him in the same breath as Fridman gives me pause ...
He’s popular because of the monochrome suit, etc… I don’t listen to a three hour interview to listen to the interviewer! I want to hear what the guest has to say. Until now, this format basically didn’t exist. The host was the star, the guest was just a prop to be wheeled out for a ten second soundbite. Nowhere else in the world do you get to hear thought leaders talk unscripted for hours about the things that excite…
You can have a low profile and still be a good interviewer and ask good questions. Lex lacks the latter two points, leaving just a terrible show.
Re: Meta Llama 3
#907The updated license has also a goodie that seems to have been overlooked in the discussion so far:
"i. If you distribute or make available the Llama Materials (or any derivative works thereof), or a product or service that uses any of them, including another AI model, you shall (A) provide a copy of this Agreement with any such Llama Materials; and (B) prominently display “Built with Meta Llama 3” on a related website, user interface, blogpost, about page, or product documentation. If you use the Llama Materials to create, train, fine tune, or otherwise improve an AI model, which is distributed or made available, you shall also include “Llama 3” at the beginning of any such AI model name."
Re: Meta Llama 3
#908The updated license has also a goodie that seems to have been overlooked in the discussion so far: "i. If you distribute or make available the Llama Materials (or any derivative works thereof), or a product or service that uses any of them, including another AI model, you shall (A) provide a copy of this Agreement with any such Llama Materials; and (B) prominently display “Built with Meta Llama 3” on a related websit…
When they include the copyright for their data sources I'll include theirs.
Re: Meta Llama 3
#909I just want to express how grateful I am that Zuck and Yann and the rest of the Meta team have adopted an open approach and are sharing the model weights, the tokenizer, information about the training data, etc. They, more than anyone else, are responsible for the explosion of open research and improvement that has happened with things like llama.cpp that now allow you to run quite decent models locally on consumer h…
This is the organization that wouldn't moderate facebook during Myanmarr yeah? The one with all the mental health research they ignore?
Zuckerberg states during the interview that once the ai reaches a certain level of capability they will stop releasing weights - i.e. they are going the "OpenAI" route: this is just trying to get ahead of the competition, it's a sound strategy when you're behind to leverage open source.
I see no reason to be optimistic about this organization, the open source community should use this an abandon them ASAP.
Re: Meta Llama 3
#910Earlier quoted context omitted.
This is so frustrating. Why don't they just make it available everywhere?
I'm always glad at these rare moments when EU or American people can get a glimpse of a life outside the first world countries.
I'd call that the "anywhere but US" phenomena. Pretty much 100% of the times I see any "deals"/promotions or whatnot on my google feed, it's US based. Unfortunately I live nowhere near to the continent.