Live data from Hacker News

GPT-4

openai.com

901–910 of 1001 posts

Re: GPT-4

#901

After watching the demos I'm convinced that the new context length will have the biggest impact. The ability to dump 32k tokens into a prompt (25,000 words) seems like it will drastically expand the reasoning capability and number of use cases. A doctor can put an entire patient's medical history in the prompt, a lawyer an entire case history, etc. As a professional...why not do this? There's a non-zero chance that i…

> What % of people can hold 25,000 words worth of information in their heads, while effectively reasoning with and manipulating it? In the general case, for arbitrary input, I think the answer to this is clearly 0. At best we can compress the text into a limited embedding with a few salient points stored in long term memory.

I'm pretty sure one could formulate way more than 25k words worth of propositions, where you would be able to determine if the proposition is true or not. This is due to your long term memory.

The GPT string is closer to short term memory, and there 25k words is way more than a human is capable of.

But a human author can offload much storage to long term (or some intermediate) memory.

In principle, GPT should be able to do so to, by basically retrain the model with the text it just created added as input. That way, it might be able to write texts that are billions of words long, but at a much greater cost of computing power, since this would require one instance of the model per book being written.

Re: GPT-4

#902
post #897

After watching the demos I'm convinced that the new context length will have the biggest impact. The ability to dump 32k tokens into a prompt (25,000 words) seems like it will drastically expand the reasoning capability and number of use cases. A doctor can put an entire patient's medical history in the prompt, a lawyer an entire case history, etc. As a professional...why not do this? There's a non-zero chance that i…

Who says GPT has the ability to hold 25,000 token in its "head"? You can send 25000 random words in the prompt and asks GPT how many pairs of words share at least one letter. I doubt that the answer will be correct...

Surely GPT could write a program to count pairs of words that share at least one letter, right? Maybe GPT-5 will be able write and run programs on the fly to answer questions like this.

Re: GPT-4

#903

After watching the demos I'm convinced that the new context length will have the biggest impact. The ability to dump 32k tokens into a prompt (25,000 words) seems like it will drastically expand the reasoning capability and number of use cases. A doctor can put an entire patient's medical history in the prompt, a lawyer an entire case history, etc. As a professional...why not do this? There's a non-zero chance that i…

[dead]

Re: GPT-4

#905

After watching the demos I'm convinced that the new context length will have the biggest impact. The ability to dump 32k tokens into a prompt (25,000 words) seems like it will drastically expand the reasoning capability and number of use cases. A doctor can put an entire patient's medical history in the prompt, a lawyer an entire case history, etc. As a professional...why not do this? There's a non-zero chance that i…

Couldn't the same be done by breaking the conversation down into chunks and adding the context incrementally?

Re: GPT-4

#906

After watching the demos I'm convinced that the new context length will have the biggest impact. The ability to dump 32k tokens into a prompt (25,000 words) seems like it will drastically expand the reasoning capability and number of use cases. A doctor can put an entire patient's medical history in the prompt, a lawyer an entire case history, etc. As a professional...why not do this? There's a non-zero chance that i…

> As a professional...why not do this? Unless GPT-4 is running locally on our own computers, there's absolutely no way dumping a patient's entire medical history into this thing could possibly be considered ethical or legal.

Unless the patient agrees. I know that for most things that can go wrong with me I wouldn't have a problem with people knowing.

Re: GPT-4

#907
It seems like an arm's race of creating the greatest ChatGPT AI will go on for the next couple years until an evolution in AI so mind blowingly advanced & complex, better & more user friendly than even ChatGPT will continue.

The world is in for a rude awakening, millions of employees can use this to get jobs done, millions of entrepreneurs or wantrepreneurs can find countless easy ways to make money in different industries utilizing this tool while everyone who fails to see the value in it don't benefit from it much like all the people who were terrified of touching a personal computer or thought it was ridiculous and would never be used in the future.

Millions of college students, high school students can use it to complete assignments & projects, it can even code really effectively given enough of the right instruction & base understanding of code.

The single most important thing, is that this technology remains open source so all people with internet access have a fair chance & access to the groundbreaking innovation, the level of wealth generation this can create is incomprehensible.

100s of millions of professionals, students, entrepreneurs around the world can all access it! Imagine how much time could be saved, efficiency can be gained with everyone using this to the fullest.

This is essentially just a super advanced version of the calculator but its nonlinear & fluid, adaptable with input so can give the answer to a wide range of subjects.

Re: GPT-4

#908

After watching the demos I'm convinced that the new context length will have the biggest impact. The ability to dump 32k tokens into a prompt (25,000 words) seems like it will drastically expand the reasoning capability and number of use cases. A doctor can put an entire patient's medical history in the prompt, a lawyer an entire case history, etc. As a professional...why not do this? There's a non-zero chance that i…

What happens with the prompts that you enter into OpenAI? I believe each and every one of those will be saved. And even if they swore that they did not would you trust them?

If my lawyer or doctor put my case history into OpenAI and I would find out about it I would definitely sue them for breach of confidentiality.

Re: GPT-4

#909
post #716

After watching the demos I'm convinced that the new context length will have the biggest impact. The ability to dump 32k tokens into a prompt (25,000 words) seems like it will drastically expand the reasoning capability and number of use cases. A doctor can put an entire patient's medical history in the prompt, a lawyer an entire case history, etc. As a professional...why not do this? There's a non-zero chance that i…

> it will drastically expand the reasoning capability > it can algorithmically do reasoning How is this machine doing reasoning ? Why do you think you can use this word in this context ?

It could only solve 3/45 Leetcode hards, I think people are giving the current iteration of this AI far too much credit for what they imagine future iterations to be.

When it has true reasoning and critical thought is when we will see it evolve into something else, for now it seems we're still in the first generations of microprocessors with GPT-4, in the grand scheme of things they only have a few transistors but we couldn't possibly comprehend where the technology would be merely a decade or two from now.

Re: GPT-4

#910
Can anyone tell me how to include images in prompts, or is that feature not actually out yet?
Post reply on HN