Live data from Hacker News

'Too many employees, but few work': Pichai, Zuckerberg sound the alarm

business-standard.com

901–910 of 1001 posts

Re: 'Too many employees, but few work': Pichai, Zuckerberg sound the alarm

#901

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Writing a messaging app is a fool's errand. You either build a chat app with someone elses money, invest in all chat apps (1/n) and hope you score a big one - e.g. like textbook publisher, or you wait and M&A the successful ones. The barrier to entry to write a chat app is zero. Even if you are brilliant you will compete against hundreds other chat apps one of which will beat out with pure luck. Never compete against…

Google has Android, which is a lot better than luck. Apple made iMessage popular just by putting it on every phone. Google did that too, but they did it wrong.

Android is a chat app?

iMessage is nice but has far far fewer users than WhatsApp, WeChat, etc.

Re: 'Too many employees, but few work': Pichai, Zuckerberg sound the alarm

#902

This is such an embarrassment for these two... Aren't YOU the CEO of your company? Didn't YOU approve hiring plans and corporate goals? If there's not enough work, why don't you find something for them to work on, or replace your managers with folks that will. Instead, it's the employee's fault for being so unproductive.

Well so what ? Hes acknowledging the problem and plan to fix it. Isnt that the kind of responsability taking you are precisely asking for ?

Re: 'Too many employees, but few work': Pichai, Zuckerberg sound the alarm

#903
post #245

As a consultant, I come around a bit. I have seen many companies with very poor productivity, and in zero of those cases was it laziness of the employees. In fact they usually would have loved to be more productive. Nobody wants to spend their life being dead weight. But as companies grow they install more and more rules and regulations that end up making sure nothing ever gets done. It is not unusual to meet "develo…

>But as companies grow they install more and more rules and regulations that end up making sure nothing ever gets done. It is not unusual to meet "developers" whose company calendar is 80% filled with meetings. Well no wonder they don't get anything done! As long as you're not mean, you can hang out at most companies for at least 6 months just doing nothing. I've been reprimanded before , when I took the initiative t…

> As long as you're not mean, you can hang out at most companies for at least 6 months just doing nothing.

Longer if you're CEO.

Re: 'Too many employees, but few work': Pichai, Zuckerberg sound the alarm

#905

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I have a feeling this extends to several areas in Google. I come from the GDC side of things and have the exact same experience. To keep my job requires very minimal effort on my part. In fact, nowadays I'm punishing myself by trying to do anything "above and beyond." This is mostly due to the rapid growth of committees and the struggle for power that has come out of it (i.e., I'm more likely to be denied by a change…

Why do you look to your job for challenges. Why not simply look at it as a way to put food on the table and use the rest of your time and resources to seek out other challenges?

It takes third of the lifetime. It's massive waste of time and energy if you get only money out of this.

Re: 'Too many employees, but few work': Pichai, Zuckerberg sound the alarm

#906

In every other HN thread, people slam FAANGs for being so bloated, and we praise the small startup where everyone on the team gets shit done fast . And in every other thread, people ask "What the hell does need 10,000 engineers for??" And now Zuck says "We've gotten complacent as a company, and we have to turn up the heat and sense of urgency, and get rid of people who aren't contributing"... and HN freaks out at thi…

Well said. Slashdot was groundbreaking for many things, especially so for categories. I wouldn’t mind having the ability to filter HN replies to “+5 Insightful” and drop anything else marked “Contrarian”.

what's wrong with contrarian view, or perhaps you just want to read things you agree with only.

Re: 'Too many employees, but few work': Pichai, Zuckerberg sound the alarm

#907
post #317

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I have met a few of those people, but every single one of them needed a justification. Some told me they felt wronged by the company somehow. For example they had experienced bullying, or didn't get promoted when they felt they should have been, or they had contributed something and then it got cut from the product, something like that in most cases. Now didn't feel they owed the company anything. Yet others said the…

Another concern that is very prevailing is rewards. I could work 2 times harder in my current position, however what is that going to bring me? Promotion or bigger bonus - it’s the same as playing stock options with your time, you are better off playing office politics for a much better RoI. Self value? Senior engineer in FAANG is almost never going to have REAL impact, so I can only enjoy thinking that someone cares…

There is none, modern humans are so productive they struggle to think of things to work on, they should just work fewer hours.

Re: 'Too many employees, but few work': Pichai, Zuckerberg sound the alarm

#908

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If somebody wants to pay me $300k to work 4 hours a week, I'll happily take the deal. As long as that's the actual acknowledged situation and not "most of your job is pretending to work and making people think you're important". I wonder how successful a lot of companies would be if they openly cut required hours in half.

If somebody wants to pay me $300k to work 4 hours a week, I'll happily take the deal. Would you take that over $300k to work 40 hours doing something you actually care about? I don't think I would.

[deleted]

Re: 'Too many employees, but few work': Pichai, Zuckerberg sound the alarm

#909

Glad these guys seem to finally be noticing. I was a software engineering manager at a lean, high-margin, profitable start-up based in the NYC area starting in the late 2000s. We were acquired in 2014 by a very typical (for the time) SV-based competitor that had raised hundreds of millions in an IPO a few years earlier. Our acquirers had yet to see a single quarter of profit, of course. I and my team had so many good…

Unless you got paid more money than your lazy peers it seems like they got a much better deal than you did. Why are you bragging about working harder and getting treated worse than your coworkers?

I don't see them as bragging. The first part of the paragraph is their previous "hard-working" perspective, and later comes understanding of the people they were looking down on.

Re: 'Too many employees, but few work': Pichai, Zuckerberg sound the alarm

#910

I work at one of the two mentioned companies. 20% of the employees do 80% of the work, and another 60% do maybe 50%. the last 20% account for -30%. It's demoralizing how incapable management seems to be at jettisoning the chaf, however it was explained to me once thusly: good engineers are hard to find and also very valuable. An unmotivated/lazy engineer is one step away from being a valuable engineer. It's worthwhil…

This is more or less exactly why Google/Meta need to be regulated and cut down to size. The fact that super-expensive engineers do not have to create value for these companies, but they are still 'affordable' while every other tech company is struggling to hire, means that they are capturing way too much value, i.e. rent.
Post reply on HN