Live data from Hacker News

Google Contributor

google.com

91–100 of 201 posts

Re: Google Contributor

#91
post #4

So this seems like an automatic version of flattr[1], except you get the perk of no adverts in return. What I wonder though is: what happens if I visit a site that I don't want to support? Can I say no? Otherwise this just invites clickbait even more. [1]: https://flattr.com/howflattrworks

Good point - can anyone with an account tell us if you can white/blacklist sites?

Re: Google Contributor

#92
post #73

This severely breaks down when you find a site you disagree with. Say you go on some anti-vaccines blog just to find after reading through a bunch of articles that they are a part of this program. Can you take your money back? Or what about a political campaign site for your rival? Or the Westboro Baptist clan?

The same problem exists with ads, though. By browsing a site with ads, you're supporting them.

Yes, but psychologically most people won't think of ads in the same way as they would of the "thank you" banner you would see when contributing to the site this way.

Re: Google Contributor

#93
post #90

A fraction of $3/mo? From a company that abandons projects left and right? I'll stick to Patreon, thanks. I'm making about $800 on a productive month now despite there being a pretty small audience for comics about a lesbian robot with PKD problems. I set "no ads for anyone" as my goal for like $50/p, which was still making far more than I ever did from ad impressions. Most people only contribute a buck or so a page…

I've been interested in Patreon for a while. Do you think there is a space on it for people running websites? I've only ever seen it used by webcomic artists.

Patreon is mostly good if you're doing A/V production, to offset the time/opportunity cost involved.

In the context of HN, I do not think Patreon would be a good fit for programming. Mostly because programmers who have sufficient skill enough to receive a following probably make enough money in their day jobs such that the money earned in a Patreon would be a drop in the bucket. :P

Many websites have been funded through Kickstarter, though.

Re: Google Contributor

#94
post #38

While a good step, personally my reasons for blocking ads rests more from a tracking standpoint than visually. Google being a middleman makes it logistically easy but removes the main reason why I would pay some amount directly to sites themselves.

Unless I'm very much mistaken, blocking ads isn't going to make a whit of difference to tracking. Unless you aggressively block cookies and javascript as well, you're up large on the radar.

Re: Google Contributor

#96
post #4

So this seems like an automatic version of flattr[1], except you get the perk of no adverts in return. What I wonder though is: what happens if I visit a site that I don't want to support? Can I say no? Otherwise this just invites clickbait even more. [1]: https://flattr.com/howflattrworks

Exactly what came to my mind. It seems to be just like flattr but you don't get to choose if the site deserves your donation or not.

Re: Google Contributor

#97
post #83

A fraction of $3/mo? From a company that abandons projects left and right? I'll stick to Patreon, thanks. I'm making about $800 on a productive month now despite there being a pretty small audience for comics about a lesbian robot with PKD problems. I set "no ads for anyone" as my goal for like $50/p, which was still making far more than I ever did from ad impressions. Most people only contribute a buck or so a page…

Patreon really has been fantastic for individuals and small groups whom people actively want to support. From tons of small creators paying their rent to the bigger successes like Jim Sterling and RedLetterMedia. This seems targeted at larger, semi-faceless websites which may only be able to survive with tiny contributions from a mass audience. Imgur is probably the best example of that; it's infrastructure that peop…

imgur is backed by its parent company which also own reddit. they are doing fine as reddit simply does not exist without it

Re: Google Contributor

#98
post #75
post #73

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The same problem exists with ads, though. By browsing a site with ads, you're supporting them.

Only in a very, very small and indirect way. And you can solve that problem by installing and ad blocker and whitelisting sites.

There will almost certainly be a way to block Contributor the same way you block ads.

Re: Google Contributor

#100

A fraction of $3/mo? From a company that abandons projects left and right? I'll stick to Patreon, thanks. I'm making about $800 on a productive month now despite there being a pretty small audience for comics about a lesbian robot with PKD problems. I set "no ads for anyone" as my goal for like $50/p, which was still making far more than I ever did from ad impressions. Most people only contribute a buck or so a page…

Horses for courses - for high volume sites this would be awesome. My immediate thought was "Great - at last Wikipedia can get rid of the annual begging bowl". It could also be a great solution to the news site paywall debate. I'd love to seamlessly reward the sites I visit often, and if Google can automate this, more power to their elbow.

Also, interesting that it is Google is doing this. It risks reducing their advertising revenue if it takes off too well - I wonder what their cut of revenue is like compared to their advertising business? This model pays them (and the content producer) per impression rather than per click.

Post reply on HN