Live data from Hacker News

Google Domains Launches to All in U.S

techcrunch.com

91–100 of 248 posts

Re: Google Domains Launches to All in U.S

#91
post #75

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Note that this means you are technically not the owner of the domain, and you may be limited in your ability to transfer it, sell it, or do other things with it. This is a myth. ICANN has published requirements on how private registrations must operate; ownership of the domain always goes to the paying owner, not the registrar.

That's interesting. Do you know where the requirements are published? I've read language recently from at least one registrar specifically stating that private registration prevents transfers to other registrars. Maybe this was before these new requirements were published.

In my recent experience, private registration prevents transfers because you are unable to receive the email message that contains the code you need to complete the transfer. I am still able to transfer my domains, but I need to turn off private registration first, so the email is sent to my real email address. This seems like a silly problem, and one that the registrars cold solve if they wanted to, but obviously they don't.

Re: Google Domains Launches to All in U.S

#92
I've been using Google Domains for several months now. I like the simplicity of their user interface and I trust Google to be good at DNS. My biggest complaint is that they don't support very many TLD's. I'd prefer to have all my domains in one place, but they don't support .co yet.

Re: Google Domains Launches to All in U.S

#93
Many people miss the point of this product:

Easily buy a domain, have it automatically hooked into the Google Apps suite of products, and easily hook it up with a select number of third party vendors like Wix or Shopify.

That's what this is about. The ability to create something cool, run a business, without having to worry as much about the technical bullshit.

Great product, and for the ease of use it is well worth $12/year. And yea, I know, $2 more a year than namecheap... but $2/year is well worth the time it takes to setup a domain (even if it is only a 2 minute ordeal).

Re: Google Domains Launches to All in U.S

#94
post #28

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Seriously? I'm surprised to see you of all people write that. No DNSSEC is a feature, not a bug.

Care to elaborate on DNSSEC? I've been interested in seeing wider adoption of DNSSEC for things like DANE.

DANE is a replacement for the CA system that effectively cedes cryptographic control of most of the Internet to world governments.

Re: Google Domains Launches to All in U.S

#95

I've been using Google Domains for several months now. I like the simplicity of their user interface and I trust Google to be good at DNS. My biggest complaint is that they don't support very many TLD's. I'd prefer to have all my domains in one place, but they don't support .co yet.

.co is now supported and the full list of supported TLDs is here https://support.google.com/domains/answer/6010092?hl=en

Re: Google Domains Launches to All in U.S

#96

I've been using Google Domains for several months now. I like the simplicity of their user interface and I trust Google to be good at DNS. My biggest complaint is that they don't support very many TLD's. I'd prefer to have all my domains in one place, but they don't support .co yet.

.co is now supported and the full list of supported TLDs is here https://support.google.com/domains/answer/6010092?hl=en

That's great news. That wasn't the case last I checked.

Re: Google Domains Launches to All in U.S

#97

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I like everything about namecheap, except the name. I hate having to mention their company name to a customer who I'm managing the domain for. It sounds like I'm using a discount service from the bottom of the barrel when that's really not how the company operates. It would be nice if I could refer to a parent company with a more appealing name.

Funny you should mention that. At my previous employer I needed to buy some domains and our current registrar was simply horrifyingly terrible (like $30 per sub-domain, yes you read that right: sub-domain. Bad support. Payment issues. Their website had issues in general) so when they asked me for alternatives I gave them NameCheap, and the biggest sticking point was the name (and how it didn't sound professional). We…

godaddy sounds worse. They even sexualize their commercials.

Re: Google Domains Launches to All in U.S

#98

None of Google Domain's features are novel. In fact the article spent most of its time talking about an up-sell. Which isn't to say Google Domain isn't a good product, just that we now should look at price because nothing else seems interesting... ~ Google Domains charges $12/year for .COM, .NET, .ORG. ~ NameCheap charges $10.69/year for .COM, $11.98/year for .NET, and $11.48/year for .ORG. Sometimes with an 18c/year…

I've been a beta-tester of Google Domains for months, and it's just such a nicer experience than GoDaddy/Namecheap. Particularly with GoDaddy, I feel like there's always a chance I'm going to click on the wrong thing and then get subscribed to some ridiculous service. With Google, it's a clean, transparent, USABLE interface.

I'd encourage people to try it out with a domain and form your own views. As for me, I'm moving all of my domains over to Google (as they get close to renewal.)

Re: Google Domains Launches to All in U.S

#99

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yea, but their domain registion prices are high. I have always appreciated the honesty/integrity/simplicity of gandi though.

You might want to try NameSilo. Cheap, free privacy, 2FA, acceptable interface.

A new provider? Us old timers stay away from those.

Do you remember RegisterFly?

Post reply on HN