Has I understood this correctly? Microsoft, a private company, has been granted the right to filter all dns traffic, and choose what will bee forward to this other company, No-IP. No-IP will so bee allowed to run there service for the remaining customers Microsoft approves? Is this common practices in the us legal system? Would it work like this in the offline world also? If my neighbor sometimes had loud parties tha…
>If my neighbor sometimes had loud parties that bothered me, could I be granted the right to stand in front of his door What if they were bothering 7.4 million people and inconveniencing many more? And then didn't show up in court in spite of summons? The police or courts will take that far more seriously.
Microsoft takes down No-IP.com domains
91–100 of 261 posts
Re: Microsoft takes down No-IP.com domains
#92Earlier quoted context omitted.
> It's not clear who determines what "sufficient steps" would be its perfectly clear. the courts.
Well, no, it isn't perfectly clear from the article - are the courts in a position to independently evaluate No-IP's efforts, or did they trust Microsoft's legal team regarding their insufficiency?
Re: Microsoft takes down No-IP.com domains
#93> On June 26, the court granted our request and made Microsoft the DNS authority for the company’s 23 free No-IP domains, allowing us to identify and route all known bad traffic to the Microsoft sinkhole and classify the identified threats. Something about this bothers me. So the courts granted MS the rights to essentially take over No-IP's DNS in order to "identify" ... "bad traffic?" The implications of this are...…
Re: Microsoft takes down No-IP.com domains
#94Earlier quoted context omitted.
Agreed. Arguably the net effect in this particular case was positive, but I can easily imagine reading this press release in a parallel universe: "Today, Sony Pictures has upped the ante against global cybercrime, taking legal action to clean up piracy... We're taking YouTube to task as the owner of infrastructure frequently exploited by cybercriminals to infringe copyrights by uploading unauthorized movie clips... O…
Isn't that close to what happened to Mega Upload and domain handed over to the government?
Microsoft failed to secure Windows XP against malware and botnets, so all Windows XP users will now be redirected to Ubuntu.com when they try to access the internet through Internet Explorer.
Re: Microsoft takes down No-IP.com domains
#95Their status twitter is interesting, they aren't going into any details as to why their service stopped working, and they haven't made any statements about the accusations against them. https://twitter.com/NoIPStatus
https://www.noip.com/blog/2014/06/30/ips-formal-statement-mi...
Re: Microsoft takes down No-IP.com domains
#96Earlier quoted context omitted.
Wholly predictable downvoting by anonymously cowardly Microsoft brown-nosers.
Fine. I downvoted you, and it's no longer anonymous. I downvoted you because both of your comments were filled with passionate garbage rather than any well-reasoned thought. I'd be willing to bet other downvoters were not simply cowardly Microsoft brown-nosers.
Re: Microsoft takes down No-IP.com domains
#97You can read No-IP's formal statement here: T https://www.noip.com/blog/2014/06/30/ips-formal-statement-mi...
Re: Microsoft takes down No-IP.com domains
#98Re: Microsoft takes down No-IP.com domains
#99Re: Microsoft takes down No-IP.com domains
#100FWIW, in my experience, No-IP is very, very responsive and helpful to abuse complaints. Though that is the extent of my experience with them, I've never thought them to be actively harboring malicious activity (unlike, say, CloudFlare).
> unlike, say, CloudFlare Care to elaborate?
The most they'll do is give you the name of the hosting company, and even then getting that is like pulling a tooth. And of course, once you contact the hosting company, it can become like a chicken-and-egg problem "you'll need to contact the DNS provider so I know what server this is being hosted on." A hosting provider that issues thousands of VPSs and has a big IP space may not be able to find the offending user just given a domain name.
On the plus side, I use Cloudflare on many of my sites for the free DDoS protection, IP anonymizing, and anti-bot features. So far it's been great.