Live data from Hacker News

_why is no more

twitter.com

91–100 of 421 posts

Re: _why is no more

#91
post #14

Is it just me, or does Ruby tend have these "personalities" more than other communities? Seems like the Ruby community focuses a lot on the "rockstar" mentality. I don't spend any time in it to know for sure, though.

Yeah it does. It's a bit like Linux-land has more interesting personalities than Microsoft-land or how skateboarders tend to be more exciting than WalMart workers.

Re: _why is no more

#92
post #2

I just noticed that _why apparently deleted his twitter account. I then found that that wasn't all he deleted: http://twitter.com/_why http://github.com/why http://whytheluckystiff.net/ http://poignantguide.net/ http://hackety.org/ http://shoooes.net/ All disappeared... For those who don't know who I'm talking about: http://wikipedia.org/wiki/Why_the_lucky_stiff

Judging by this, it looks like his account was hacked: http://twitpic.com/ehm2h.

Re: _why is no more

#93
post #14

Is it just me, or does Ruby tend have these "personalities" more than other communities? Seems like the Ruby community focuses a lot on the "rockstar" mentality. I don't spend any time in it to know for sure, though.

Which is why I love Zed Shaw's response:

"Hmm, I think it's more possible that _why got hacked than he pulled a me." http://twitter.com/zedshaw/status/3409334842

Re: _why is no more

#94

The title is inappropriate (without really knowing what happened to _why). Only his online identify is no more!

I don't know about that. I think _why was his online identity... only sometimes he ventured into the real-world to talk to people.

So, perhaps it is accurate, since it seems like the online persona has vanished, so in a way _why is no more.

Maybe the real person needed to escape from the persona... who knows?

Re: _why is no more

#95
post #59
post #38

Wow, one of the few personalities to ever remain truly anonymous on the Internet vanishes in a day. Sad sad day. :(

No, his real name has been on HN before.

Do you have a link for this, as far as I know, no one knows his real name, job, etc.

Re: _why is no more

#96
post #68
post #45

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That was pretty immature, to delete the repos as well. They were git repos, right? I am new to git, but my understanding is you pretty much have to type git clone --i-dont-want-a-full-copy-of-the-repository-please-screw-me-over-if-the-master-vanishes to be in a position where you are "dependent" on the code (i.e. have looked at it, ever) and do not have a full copy of the entire project extending to the mists of preh…

--depth does have some benefits... one of my friends tried to do a 'git svn clone' of his work's svn repo... he gave up after the process had been running for a full 3 or 4 weeks. That said --depth doesn't have too much use when it comes to native git repos though. Unless you have a ton of binary files in the repo and don't want the full history of all of them...

None of _why's projects were that big, so in this case it's kind of a moot point.

Re: _why is no more

#97
post #14

Is it just me, or does Ruby tend have these "personalities" more than other communities? Seems like the Ruby community focuses a lot on the "rockstar" mentality. I don't spend any time in it to know for sure, though.

Smalltalk had it's share of personalities. I am witness to drama at OOPSLA that would have made for some damn good movie scenes. But all of this predates YouTube, Blogs, Twitter, etc...

Re: _why is no more

#98
post #28

I suspect some sort of burn out. Honestly the guy was a machine. I remember looking at his commit logs for all of his public Github projects and wondering how he managed it. And mind you, that only accounts for code publicly released and doesn't address any private projects he might have been working on.

I'm on the shoes mailing list and he recently made this announcement:

Aug 3rd: Okay, wow, hello, I'm very behind on this list, I hope you will pardon me. I've been away for the summer, taking a break from everything.

Well, enough of that, time's up: I hope to concentrate strictly on getting Shoes 3 done. While it's disappointing to see what a poor job I've done with Shoes, I am going to try to do what I can to aright the situation by at least getting us some more speed and stability. (As with all of my projects, it's just a toy experiment which is full of an unpredictable amount of both the sweet and bitter.)

My hope is to release the final version by September 7th. Please, if you want something fixed for Shoes 3, it will need to be filed on github, in the issues section. Yes, I think that will work just great.

_why

Perhaps this is a publicity stunt to popularize the new and improved Hackety Hack?!

Re: _why is no more

#99

There's a new repository up on his Github: http://github.com/why/lol/tree/master Description: wtf adam, are you this slow I'm guessing he got hacked. Edit: Nevermind, the repo's been deleted.

Apparently there's no holding period for deleted names on GitHub.

If he wanted his twitter account to be taken by somebody else, he could have renamed it before deleting it. If you rename a twitter account, the old name is freed up instantly, but if you delete an account, it is held for an unknown period of time.

Re: _why is no more

#100
post #85

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Let's wait for the circumstances before passing judgement.

Name some circumstances which justify pulling down a broadly-used open source project like Hpricot. At a certain point it must be admitted that a project has a life beyond its author.

He could have had his computer, or email hacked.. have to wait to see if we hear from him before we assume he actually cleared all the accounts himself.
Post reply on HN