Live data from Hacker News

Skype group video calling becomes free

blogs.skype.com

91–100 of 169 posts

Re: Skype group video calling becomes free

#91
I use Skype everyday to communicate with family abroad. I have a camera mounted on my television. The quality of Skype is abysmal. Most of the time, you do not have HD video.

When I switch over to using facetime, the video quality is amazing. I don't know what happened to Skype, but its quality is by far the worst available on the market.

Re: Skype group video calling becomes free

#92
post #61

I don't understand why Microsoft took so long to do this. If they had been faster after Google Hangouts, it never would have gained a beachhead. Xbox One could easily find a secondary market as a conference room device; a Microsoft version of Airplay and Chromecast (ideally open to Mac and general web as well) would take more engineering, but would have been awesome too.

[deleted]

Re: Skype group video calling becomes free

#93
post #48
post #25

That title/URL is bugging me, I was thinking in a more cynical world it may read something like: "skype-is-concerned-of-competition-and-matches-features" About the spying, I feel sorry for any poor sucker watching my life! :¬D All that effort for such little excitement.

I am pretty sure, if I had access to your skype chat/camera I would find enough information to extort you. There is one moment, or one line of text or one picture that you don't want to escape your mind.

Edit: Meh, pointless reply is pointless, I'll just agree, it's easier.

My attempts at humouring others escapes me once again... a well.

Re: Skype group video calling becomes free

#94
post #54
post #43

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I prefer Skype since although it has always been a huge CPU hog, its UI is perfect for beginners (i.e. family) and in the decade I've used it, I've never once been cross-sold some pointless feature the parent company are currently trying to promote. Note Hangouts itself once was Gtalk, which I was a user of, prior to the first cattle herding on to Google+. Now Gundotra is out the door, there is no telling into which…

Really good point on Skype being friendly to beginners. I never realized it but my parents get really uncomfortable when I try to walk them over how to set up Google Hangout, and most of the time the conversation just continues on Skype and we drop the experiment. I mean for them its a hassle to install all those plugins and then invite and open emails and confirm and whatnot.

The Android experience is truly far superior to the web interface. My parents just hit the video camera button in the chat app and call me or my younger brother.

Re: Skype group video calling becomes free

#95
post #91

I use Skype everyday to communicate with family abroad. I have a camera mounted on my television. The quality of Skype is abysmal. Most of the time, you do not have HD video. When I switch over to using facetime, the video quality is amazing. I don't know what happened to Skype, but its quality is by far the worst available on the market.

Yeah, I don't know what the heck is wrong with Skype either. On video calls, the quality is lacking most of the time and even though we're both on fast broadband connections, the "call quality" is still a 3 out of 5 bars. Switch to Google Hangouts and everything works fine with a lot less connectivity issues.

Re: Skype group video calling becomes free

#97

Finally! I don't know anyone who likes G+ over Skype, but we all use it for the group video features.

funny, because I don't know anyone who likes skype over G+

Funny, because I dont know anyone who use G+ at all. Except these who was forced to make G+ profile while was registering just for e-mail.

And same time I know hundreds who use skype on daily basic on literally every device they own. Including TV. Only device in my house lacking skype it's refrigerator.

Re: Skype group video calling becomes free

#98
post #61

I don't understand why Microsoft took so long to do this. If they had been faster after Google Hangouts, it never would have gained a beachhead. Xbox One could easily find a secondary market as a conference room device; a Microsoft version of Airplay and Chromecast (ideally open to Mac and general web as well) would take more engineering, but would have been awesome too.

> If they had been faster after Google Hangouts, it never would have gained a beachhead.

That's why Microsoft took so long to do this. They had little incentive to do so until others did, and even when the writing on the wall was clear, they still faced the innovator's dilemma.

Re: Skype group video calling becomes free

#99
post #86
post #68

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Can you point me to Skype's API? I always thought that Skype was a closed protocol and that they don't want any other client applications using their service...

Messenger probably didn't want any other clients using their service, but that didn't stop the Pidgins and Trillians of the world... :)

Very true but Skype appears to present a much bigger problem for reverse engineering (I have only seen someone reverse engineer the texting part of Skype and not the video)

Re: Skype group video calling becomes free

#100
post #61

I don't understand why Microsoft took so long to do this. If they had been faster after Google Hangouts, it never would have gained a beachhead. Xbox One could easily find a secondary market as a conference room device; a Microsoft version of Airplay and Chromecast (ideally open to Mac and general web as well) would take more engineering, but would have been awesome too.

I don't know either. I've been using Google Hangouts for the last few months, and those so easily could have been Skype chats instead if that was available. They let Google get so far along with this.
Post reply on HN