How we got read access on Google’s production servers
91–100 of 197 posts
Re: How we got read access on Google’s production servers
#92I never understood why internal or external entities were included in XML. Can anyone explain what useful purpose they serve?
They were useful for document editing use cases - remember this was before SOAP and xml serialization, and sgml tooling that already supported this stuff existed. You can see the record of the decision here: http://www.w3.org/XML/9712-reports.html#ID5
Re: How we got read access on Google’s production servers
#93So, when you have read access to googles prod servers, what else would be fun to do besides reading /etc/passwd ? Getting the source?
I'd say logins and passwords of millions of Google accounts would be the most valuable asset for a blackhat.
Re: How we got read access on Google’s production servers
#94In large production environments it's almost impossible to avoid bugs - and some of them are going to be nasty. What sets great and security conscious companies apart from the rest is how they deal with them. This is an examplary response from google. They respond promptly (with humor no less) and thank the guys that found the bug. Then they proceeded to pay out a bounty of $10.000. Well done google.
I am really glad about how they responded. Whenever Tinfoil has found vulnerabilities in companies like United Airlines[0], for example, those companies mostly respond with anger rather than graciousness. [0] https://www.tinfoilsecurity.com/blog/132969897
Re: How we got read access on Google’s production servers
#95Re: How we got read access on Google’s production servers
#96So, when you have read access to googles prod servers, what else would be fun to do besides reading /etc/passwd ? Getting the source?
With the kind of monitoring that Google has in place your access will last a very short time.
Re: How we got read access on Google’s production servers
#97Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'd say logins and passwords of millions of Google accounts would be the most valuable asset for a blackhat.
Yes golly you must be right, i bet google just uses rsync to copy the passwords of billions of user accounts to thousands upon thousands of machines all over the world, in plain text! It's probably in /var/lib/every_user_password_in_plain_text.txt!
Nice throwaway. LOL.
Re: How we got read access on Google’s production servers
#98Re: How we got read access on Google’s production servers
#99Earlier quoted context omitted.
I am really glad about how they responded. Whenever Tinfoil has found vulnerabilities in companies like United Airlines[0], for example, those companies mostly respond with anger rather than graciousness. [0] https://www.tinfoilsecurity.com/blog/132969897
Exactly. I just saw that the local bank my parents use is still vulnerable to the Heartbleed Bug. But you know what? I don't want to go down there and talk to them because I'm quite certain they'll call the police because I "hacked into their systems".
Re: How we got read access on Google’s production servers
#100... And this is why you want to discontinue products and services your engineers can't be motivated to maintain. Amazing. This should scare anyone who has ever left an old side project running; I could see a lot of companies doing a product/service portfolio review based on this as a case study.
Works for small, old, etc products as the value of breech will probably be less than value of bounty + cred.