Earlier quoted context omitted.
There a literally millions of open positions in the US economy, and millions of upper-middle class liberal-college educated jobless millennials who can't be bothered to master these STEM fields to qualify. They all want to be an aid worker & save the world or something, or to be paid for playing a banjo. The only reason half of the people even get jobs is better qualified, harder working foreigners are kept out of th…
"literally millions of open positions in the US economy": And almost four times as many unemployed people seeking work. Those open positions numbers are based on self-reporting, too, and they don't account for whether companies are actively seeking candidates, are offering a competitive salary, or are expecting reasonable qualifications. Lots of companies would love to hire busloads of experts at a bargain rate if th…
Why Millennials Can’t Grow Up
91–93 of 93 posts
Re: Why Millennials Can’t Grow Up
#92Earlier quoted context omitted.
There a literally millions of open positions in the US economy, and millions of upper-middle class liberal-college educated jobless millennials who can't be bothered to master these STEM fields to qualify. They all want to be an aid worker & save the world or something, or to be paid for playing a banjo. The only reason half of the people even get jobs is better qualified, harder working foreigners are kept out of th…
The previous generations didn't exactly do anything to help us realize this reality. Hell, I feel like I won the roulette wheel of life sometimes in that my CS degree, which I naturally graduated towards, is in great demand. And other kids were pushed equally strongly to their history, sociology, philosophy, and english degrees.
Re: Why Millennials Can’t Grow Up
#93Earlier quoted context omitted.
How is it a "bailout" for the government to adjust the funding of a tax-funded program by adjusting the tax? By that definition, I'm being forced to bail out the military every time they spend tax money to buy a jet fighter. You are thinking of Social Security as an investment program. It is not. The government is not forcing you to invest in a fund, it is taxing you to pay for other peoples' benefits. Eventually, it…
It is a "bailout" because the government originally claimed that Social Security would be a self-sustaining investment system, as far as I understand it. But I'm not dead set on arguing for calling it a "bailout." It is what it is, the terminology here is not that important. You are right---I am not being conned. Just forced. I will eventually go to a country that better allows me to pursue my values if I can find on…
Please do your research. The government claimed no such thing.
here is as good a place to start as any:
http://www.ssa.gov/history/fdrstmts.html
Social security was a government program. Funded by taxes. From the start.
Note, the first generation? yeah, the retired folks got social security benefits right away, even though they had paid in nothing. This very clearly made it not work as an investment.
I mean, it's perfectly reasonable to disagree with safety net programs.
But don't claim that our safety net programs are bad as investments when they are clearly not investments at all.