Earlier quoted context omitted.
No, I don't believe Bitcoin is a ponzi scheme at all. And I really don't think my age is relevant, you either have arguments or you don't. But let's come back to that notion of yours > If you're always incentivized to hold something and never incentivized to spend it, it becomes more of an asset than a currency." Let's say all you got is 10btc and $0 in your bank account. And you need some food. You're probably gonna…
When it comes to thinking "this time is different" and "I have an idea to refactor the world economy", your age is VERY relevant. Everyone thinks they have a simple way to fix everything when they're 22. By the time you're 30-40 it's amazing how much smarter the rest of the world got. You can take my word for it as regards politics and investment, or not, it's your money. On the argument, you're implicitly admitting…
Its really not. If you are trying to evaluate how good of an idea someone is likely to come up with, their scope of understanding of economics and past efforts in that field is relevant, and age is an extremely poor proxy for that. (It's exactly the same problem as using age alone as a proxy for to measure programming skill would be.)
If you have an actual idea in front of you, its better to just evaluate that rather than the source.
> Everyone thinks they have a simple way to fix everything when they're 22. By the time you're 30-40 it's amazing how much smarter the rest of the world got.
That's not universally true, and to the extent it is true, its significantly about increased focus on near-term self (or immediate-circle) interests rather than increased knowledge -- there's a reason why major advancements more often come out of work people do very early in their career.