The really unfortunate part of the situation is that they are generally required to defend their trademark or else it goes away. Even when they know something is "fair use" or whatever. "Unlike patents and copyrights, which in theory are granted for one-off fixed terms, trademarks remain valid as long as the owner actively uses and defends them and maintains their registrations with the competent authorities. This of…
In the future, all space marines will be Warhammer 40K space marines
91–100 of 150 posts
Re: In the future, all space marines will be Warhammer 40K space marines
#92Earlier quoted context omitted.
Legal wrangling aside, I don't see a problem with a lack of "innovation", the same WH40K I played as a kid would still be fun today, however it is certainly interesting to see how WoTC has attempted to innovate to sell new products. The main difference, of course, is that WH40K is wargaming min-maxy and specific troop-based versus D&D allowing a great deal of flexibility in the rules and creative content.
>it is certainly interesting to see how WoTC has attempted to innovate to sell new products. GW has no affiliation with WotC. Are you thinking of TSR, the makers of DnD?
Re: In the future, all space marines will be Warhammer 40K space marines
#93Earlier quoted context omitted.
"the homemade pieces are accepted and encouraged" It's not like they can do much about cardboard cut-outs and stand-ins.
or even these - the proud owner states they've been used in actual tournaments with permission[0]: https://twitpic.com/show/iphone/bcbymh https://twitpic.com/show/iphone/bcbyvf [0] http://warhammer.org.uk/phpBB/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=108484
Re: In the future, all space marines will be Warhammer 40K space marines
#94Earlier quoted context omitted.
So why is this not an open and shut case ?
Because lack of "prior art" is not a requirement for trademark, nor is uniqueness. "Coke" has other meanings http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coke_(fuel) and yet is still trademarked.
Re: In the future, all space marines will be Warhammer 40K space marines
#95Earlier quoted context omitted.
So why is this not an open and shut case ?
Because lack of "prior art" is not a requirement for trademark, nor is uniqueness. "Coke" has other meanings http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coke_(fuel) and yet is still trademarked.
Re: In the future, all space marines will be Warhammer 40K space marines
#96Re: In the future, all space marines will be Warhammer 40K space marines
#97Once it's a piece of art it should be immune to all and every trademark or copyright (if, of course, the art in question is not a strict copy of another copyrighted piece of art).
That's the only way.
Re: In the future, all space marines will be Warhammer 40K space marines
#98Legally, where does that leave StarCraft, especially the soon to be released Heart of the Swarm (all have units called Space Marines)? If GW don't (and never did) enforce their trademark against Blizzard, do they have any say against a book author that wants to push the topic in front of a court? AFAIK, Blizzard didn't license the term.
Re: In the future, all space marines will be Warhammer 40K space marines
#99This is unfortunate but not unexpected. I used to run a fairly large 40K website (Tau Online, now defunct). I'd regularly receive letters and e-mails from the Games Workshop legal team. I remember one time, someone had made a simple post on our forums saying they were thinking of selling a short story they'd written based around the 40K World. He hadn't named the story. It wasn't for sale. He was just thinking out lo…
Re: In the future, all space marines will be Warhammer 40K space marines
#100Legally, where does that leave StarCraft, especially the soon to be released Heart of the Swarm (all have units called Space Marines)? If GW don't (and never did) enforce their trademark against Blizzard, do they have any say against a book author that wants to push the topic in front of a court? AFAIK, Blizzard didn't license the term.