Sanders introduces bill to ban artificial superintelligence and pause AI

Post by therealpygon » Sat, Sep 05, 2026, 8:54 PM UTC

GPerson wrote: post #90

therealpygon wrote: post #89

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes, you’ve been trolling everyone in this thread about how they are traitors in response to them questioning someone who stated that anyone who disagreed with pausing AI are traitors because they support “super intelligence”, not even “uncontrolled”. You didn’t “just” do anything, and you should probably try reading your comments and the context again rather than whatever obvious point you thought you were “just” ma…

You are literally unable to hold a hypothetical in your head, just like in that study. It’s amazing. I’m trying to help you understand what this thread is about but you simply cannot do it. I didn’t read any of your post btw.

You’re still taking? Literally no one cares about your opinion in this entire thread, but uh, go ahead and keep making your idiot point.

Here you can have the last word since you apparently need it so bad for “just” saying something:

Post by GPerson » Sun, Sep 06, 2026, 12:21 AM UTC

therealpygon wrote: post #91

GPerson wrote: post #90

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You are literally unable to hold a hypothetical in your head, just like in that study. It’s amazing. I’m trying to help you understand what this thread is about but you simply cannot do it. I didn’t read any of your post btw.

You’re still taking? Literally no one cares about your opinion in this entire thread, but uh, go ahead and keep making your idiot point. Here you can have the last word since you apparently need it so bad for “just” saying something:

Okay so a conditional works like this. There is a proposition A implies B. This does not mean A is true or false. It means that if A actually were true, then B would also be true.

Re: Sanders introduces bill to ban artificial superintelligence and pause AI

Re: Sanders introduces bill to ban artificial superintelligence and pause AI