Earlier quoted context omitted.
Could you get people to use the NATO phonetic alphabet for the spelling part? I suppose a challenge is that many people don't know the whole thing, even if they're aware it exists.
NATO phonetic is to be understandable over a noisy radio channel, if you want just distinct sounds then Talon Voice users settled on shorter ones easier to use all the time: air a bat b cap c drum d each e fine f gust g harp h sit i jury j crunch k look l made m near n odd o pit p quench q red r sun s trap t urge u vest v whale w plex x yank y zip z
Speech Recognition and TTS in less than 500kb
91–100 of 101 posts
Re: Speech Recognition and TTS in less than 500kb
#92Stt/tts systems always seem to me so promising, but I pretty much never use voice to interface with a computer. Sometimes instead of typing on my phone, I use a voice dictation. I would be keen to use voice to control Claude code, but I've always felt that the way I speak is different from the way I write good prompts. Fishing for anecdotes here, does anyone have any good tts/stt experiences?
Re: Speech Recognition and TTS in less than 500kb
#93Earlier quoted context omitted.
During cycling! Do you have a phone mount on your bike that you use while biking or is it all in-ear?
I have my phone in my pocket, no screen interaction is required. I use a headset (Shokz OpenComm2) with wind muff (when cycling). I made an Android app that listens for codex turn-complete or intermediate updates and plays them back to me. My answer is transcribed and pasted back to the relevant codex (tmux) session on the server (which I can select by voice) a tiny layer helps with things like /new, /plan, answer se…
Re: Speech Recognition and TTS in less than 500kb
#94Earlier quoted context omitted.
I have my phone in my pocket, no screen interaction is required. I use a headset (Shokz OpenComm2) with wind muff (when cycling). I made an Android app that listens for codex turn-complete or intermediate updates and plays them back to me. My answer is transcribed and pasted back to the relevant codex (tmux) session on the server (which I can select by voice) a tiny layer helps with things like /new, /plan, answer se…
I'd love to hear more about it!
Re: Speech Recognition and TTS in less than 500kb
#95Earlier quoted context omitted.
Talking on the phone is extremely dangerous? What are your thoughts on talking with a passenger? Is that something that people ought to stop doing? Drive in silence. 100% focus? Seems like an overreaction.
It's not my thoughts, it's simple facts. All the studies show it's not an over-reaction, you're 400% more likely to have an accident. It is extremely dangerous and it's not an over-reaction, the more people do this, the more people die. It's simple maths. If you're doing extended programming sessions, you're not paying attention to the road like you should be. And no, talking to a passenger is not as dangerous as it'…
After googling the 8th or 10th result had a link to the study I assume you are referencing.
I just don't agree with you. I believe that there is risk when driving inherently although relatively low and a 400% increase from 0.0001 to 0.0004 does not really concern me.
I have been in one accident in 15 years and I was not at fault and it was unavoidable.
Many people engage in all sorts of distracted driving, texting, eating, driving while tired etc. which I would wager are more detrimental than speaking on the phone.
Having your one bone to pick being speaking on the phone just seems absurd and an odd message to preach when nearly everyone does it.
Re: Speech Recognition and TTS in less than 500kb
#96Earlier quoted context omitted.
What I want is a 1940s style “taking dictation” where the words I say go through a step where the goal is to create the text Im imagining. So if I say “… very significant, actually just significant…” what Claude Code receives is “…significant…”. I built this myself with whisper -> “secretary” prompt -> Claude Code, but having the first two steps be interactive is really what I would want.
I use dictation to drive Claude code frequently, and it’s never had a problem with stream of consciousness and retroactive correction. Maybe try just direct voice and see if you notice any difference versus pre-cleaning?
Re: Speech Recognition and TTS in less than 500kb
#97Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's not my thoughts, it's simple facts. All the studies show it's not an over-reaction, you're 400% more likely to have an accident. It is extremely dangerous and it's not an over-reaction, the more people do this, the more people die. It's simple maths. If you're doing extended programming sessions, you're not paying attention to the road like you should be. And no, talking to a passenger is not as dangerous as it'…
In what way is talking on the phone a different cognitive load that talking to a passenger? After googling the 8th or 10th result had a link to the study I assume you are referencing. I just don't agree with you. I believe that there is risk when driving inherently although relatively low and a 400% increase from 0.0001 to 0.0004 does not really concern me. I have been in one accident in 15 years and I was not at fau…
The difference between talking to a passenger versus using a hands-free phone is an interesting one. While they intuitively feel similar, it has been shown that speaking on the phone results in significantly worse performance. This is because a passenger shares awareness of the driving situation and surroundings. Their conversation naturally adapts to traffic conditions, often pausing or shifting topics to focus on the road, which can help with awareness.
Texting and eating are far more dangerous as they divert eyes from the road and introduce motor interference. Fatigue also severely degrades both attention and cognitive function.
Coding while driving does seem unnecessarily risky though. Unlike other non-motor distractions, it demands more cognitive engagement without necessarily moving your hands or eyes. It is far more demanding than a standard phone conversation, which has already been shown to impair driving.
You will make errors that you won’t remember because your brain is occupied with the code rather than monitoring the environment.
Your ability to recognize objects and react slows down. If a child runs into the road, that split-second delay could mean the difference between stopping or killing them. The same applies to sudden obstacles like kangaroos in my case. The delay in reaction could turn a near-miss into a fatal crash.
Most of the risk lies in the complex and unexpected situations. It's really not worth it, just listen to some music or an audiobook and enjoy your ride. Do coding later.
If you have any other psychology or cognitive-related questions to it I can try and answer. I'm not an expert in this specific area but we did some work on it at university.
Re: Speech Recognition and TTS in less than 500kb
#98Earlier quoted context omitted.
NATO phonetic is to be understandable over a noisy radio channel, if you want just distinct sounds then Talon Voice users settled on shorter ones easier to use all the time: air a bat b cap c drum d each e fine f gust g harp h sit i jury j crunch k look l made m near n odd o pit p quench q red r sun s trap t urge u vest v whale w plex x yank y zip z
“Plex” ?
b) Talon Voice is a configurable voice engine, the commands are something you setup and people use common shared starter packs and then edit their own, so there isn’t a formal standard, plex might be different in some setups?
c) they just have to be sounds you can vocalise which are distinct from each other, and it helps if they are one syllable when using them often; there’s no reason they have to be dictionary words or mean anything.
Re: Speech Recognition and TTS in less than 500kb
#99Earlier quoted context omitted.
“Plex” ?
a) I went to a Talon Voice cheat sheet and copied them out because I didn’t remember them. Is plex not right? b) Talon Voice is a configurable voice engine, the commands are something you setup and people use common shared starter packs and then edit their own, so there isn’t a formal standard, plex might be different in some setups? c) they just have to be sounds you can vocalise which are distinct from each other,…
Re: Speech Recognition and TTS in less than 500kb
#100Earlier quoted context omitted.
“Plex” ?
a) I went to a Talon Voice cheat sheet and copied them out because I didn’t remember them. Is plex not right? b) Talon Voice is a configurable voice engine, the commands are something you setup and people use common shared starter packs and then edit their own, so there isn’t a formal standard, plex might be different in some setups? c) they just have to be sounds you can vocalise which are distinct from each other,…
One could make "Pit" be "t", with that logic.