Earlier quoted context omitted.
The capitalist response to that would be that the investment in companies is better because it makes everyone richer in the long term by increasing overall wealth. I'm not sure I buy it but it's an effect to consider.
That does sometimes happen - investment does cause development. The mistake is to assume that's always what happens, and that everybody can benefit from the development.
Greece Is Richer. So Why Do So Many Greeks Still Feel Poor?
91–100 of 105 posts
Re: Greece Is Richer. So Why Do So Many Greeks Still Feel Poor?
#92Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yep. I'm not an economist but my social democratic common sense would tell me to look at the bottom 10% income bracket and see how they're doing. Incidentally these people are the best economic citizens because if you give them money they'll spend every cent of it because they need to buy food and energy, use health care and pay rent. In other words if a rich person gets a million they (if they're sane) spend a fract…
The capitalist response to that would be that the investment in companies is better because it makes everyone richer in the long term by increasing overall wealth. I'm not sure I buy it but it's an effect to consider.
Re: Greece Is Richer. So Why Do So Many Greeks Still Feel Poor?
#93Earlier quoted context omitted.
No, I implied it did. I actually think that free market competition has been the main driving force behind human progress for quite a while now. The issue is that the “winning condition” of capitalism results in the complete subversion of that process. So it’s always a balance.
Free market competition is the opposite of capitalism though. Free market competition means that markets are free, but capitalism means that markets are controlled by the richest.
Re: Greece Is Richer. So Why Do So Many Greeks Still Feel Poor?
#94Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yep. I'm not an economist but my social democratic common sense would tell me to look at the bottom 10% income bracket and see how they're doing. Incidentally these people are the best economic citizens because if you give them money they'll spend every cent of it because they need to buy food and energy, use health care and pay rent. In other words if a rich person gets a million they (if they're sane) spend a fract…
The capitalist response to that would be that the investment in companies is better because it makes everyone richer in the long term by increasing overall wealth. I'm not sure I buy it but it's an effect to consider.
Re: Greece Is Richer. So Why Do So Many Greeks Still Feel Poor?
#95Earlier quoted context omitted.
The median is usually used for this; it throws away outliers on both sides.
This is not quite the same as the median: it is possible for the bottom 50% to improve but for the median to stay the same (i.e. imagine if everyone in the bottom 50% suddenly equaled the best of them). But the median is a lot better than the mean for not being distorted by large changes in the top and bottom percentiles.
Re: Greece Is Richer. So Why Do So Many Greeks Still Feel Poor?
#96Earlier quoted context omitted.
Free market competition is the opposite of capitalism though. Free market competition means that markets are free, but capitalism means that markets are controlled by the richest.
They inseparable, though? i.e. every market participant is incentivized to accumulate as much “capital” in any way they can. Competitors keep them in check which leaves a bigger share to consumers. Historically that has not been a stable system and at some point one or a couple of companies end up winning and there is no one to prevent them from doing anything they want.
It is no problem if the best snack vendor can afford to buy the biggest snack truck. In fact that should be encouraged so we can have more of the best snacks. It's also no problem if he can afford a mansion. He deserves it for working so hard on snacks. It's bad if he can do anything that negatively affects his competitors, like buying the adjacent stands to leave empty, buying up all the snack ingredients so nobody else can get them, bribing the market manager, or making a law that all snacks must be french fries.
Re: Greece Is Richer. So Why Do So Many Greeks Still Feel Poor?
#97Earlier quoted context omitted.
So what? That seems entirely tangential. Unless your point that economic inequality inherently accelerates technological progress (which seems valid at least to some extent)?
You don't think capitalism played a role in eliminating poverty?
Re: Greece Is Richer. So Why Do So Many Greeks Still Feel Poor?
#98The way this wealth inequality is so common around the world. makes me wonder if the next time the pitchforks come out, it will be some kind of global uprising. Perhaps accelerated by social media. Or are the elite better able to control the masses in this age?
Nah, it will be triggered by a debt crisis. Remember the plurality of the rich are working off asset loans on paper wealth. Those credit lines get cut by an event, that triggers an asset sell off which creates a vicious cycle.
Re: Greece Is Richer. So Why Do So Many Greeks Still Feel Poor?
#99Earlier quoted context omitted.
And yet we are also living in some of the strongest wealth inequality in the last 100 years at least. https://ourworldindata.org/economic-inequality
So what? Inequality is not inherently bad.
Re: Greece Is Richer. So Why Do So Many Greeks Still Feel Poor?
#100Seems like housing again: > Rents have surged in recent years, driven by tourism, foreign investment and a shortage of affordable housing. The cost of housing now consumes one of the largest shares of disposable income in the European Union My impression is that where housing is expensive, there will be complaints of unaffordability (obviously), but also vice versa, that where there is unaffordability, housing always…
Why are prices up even though population is down over the past ten years? Did everybody decide to move to the city or something?
> Between 2009 and the trough of the bailout years in 2016, average household wealth fell by roughly 35%
35% of the land didn't disappear and I'm guessing 35% of the buildings didn't disappear... So what changed was the measurements... GDP values seem even shadier.