91–100 of 100 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
How so? I would think that "whose fault is it" and "what can be done about it" are independent questions.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Wow, 2 minutes and content already flagged and downvoted into oblivion. I guess we're STILL doing this years later - people still can't have a discussion about this. That's pretty unbelievable HN.
Still doing what, flagging attempts to derail threads into off-topic flamefests?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
In a way, it's a shame that the gp comment is flagged. It is batshit crazy from my pov, but this is a very commonly held opinion by the people now setting health policy for the USA. I kind of wish there was a different flag-like option for cases like this. That would mean that it was more than down-voted, but not hidden. I feel like it is very important that the disclosure of "bad" opinions should be allowed to be ve…
[CRACKPOT] flag or something
Earlier quoted context omitted.
[CRACKPOT] flag or something
Oh no! Someone sees the world differently. Instead of attempting to understand why, I'll just toss a pejorative at them, because I'm not emotionally or mentally capable of anyone thinking differently than I do.
However, I do get it. From a moderation POV, you come off like a troll. That does suck for moderation stress.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Oh no! Someone sees the world differently. Instead of attempting to understand why, I'll just toss a pejorative at them, because I'm not emotionally or mentally capable of anyone thinking differently than I do.
I literally argued that your comments should not be hidden. Instead, they should be very openly ridiculed. However, I do get it. From a moderation POV, you come off like a troll. That does suck for moderation stress.
One wonders why this was flagged. It appears to be a high quality and non-combative analysis of how we were able to advance vaccine development so quickly without losing safety or efficacy?
Because there a bunch of social media deluded asshats that want to argue about it in bad faith. See also: "Fauci caused COVID" Unfortunately social media deluded asshats is the prevailing theme of the United States on this 250 year anniversary. See also: "Trumpty Dumpty somehow isn't a corrupt incompetent fraud." The nice way to put it: this has, unfortunately, become a political lightning rod.
One wonders why this was flagged. It appears to be a high quality and non-combative analysis of how we were able to advance vaccine development so quickly without losing safety or efficacy?
What @daveguy said, it talks about Covid and vaccines, two conspiracy-theory hot buttons so of course it'll get flagged the minute it's posted. If you also throw in Epstein, Soros, and Hunter Biden's laptop it'll practically make it self-flagging.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Certainly not people like Anthony Fauci and his Jesuit buddies.
Way to deflect