Live data from Hacker News

Noam Shazeer Joins OpenAI

twitter.com

91–100 of 478 posts

Re: Noam Shazeer Joins OpenAI

#91
post #53
post #45

https://old.reddit.com/r/singularity/comments/1u8xc9m/most_l... Seems like there are some insights here! edit: it seems the post has been removed but comments are viewable. 1 liner summary: To put it lightly, the dude was politically outspoken and held strong beliefs.

[flagged]

[flagged]

Re: Noam Shazeer Joins OpenAI

#92
post #38

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It could be the opposite. Those are really useful people, they deserve this more than football players

Idk, football players actually make a bunch of people happy and entertained. 80% of the United States wishes this tech never existed. What they're working on is just making peoples jobs, skills obsolete and trying to invent machines that will concentrate the worlds wealth into the hands of the people who own those machines.

Very few people interpret football so much that the actual frontier work of the best players matter. Out of 30 friends I know who like football only 1 of them could explain what’s going on in the field technically. For most people, pro players are replaceable.

Popular entertainment and unique progress of human civilization can’t be really compared either

Re: Noam Shazeer Joins OpenAI

#94
Silver lining: given the leaked financials of OpenAI, he might very well be joining a sinking ship.

Also, why didn't they nail him down contractually when they bought character.ai ... isn't that pretty standard with these type of superstar (re)hires?

Re: Noam Shazeer Joins OpenAI

#95
post #76
post #48

Some context for people who haven’t followed the full loop: Shazeer was a long-time Google researcher, joined Google in 2000, and was one of the co-authors of “Attention Is All You Need.” He left Google in 2021 to co-found Character.AI. In 2024, Google brought him and some Character.AI researchers back via a licensing/talent deal with Character.AI (reportedly around $2.7B). He was then made a Gemini co-lead. Now he’s…

this character.ai? https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/ce3xgwyywe4o

The Netflix documentary will reveal he was secretly working for Sam Altman the whole time... (Cue diabolical VC-backed evil laugh.)

Google lost three critical years chasing AGI, and got acquired by SpaceX, now a Dyson Sphere startup whose pitch deck is just: "What if we put a paywall around the Sun?"

Re: Noam Shazeer Joins OpenAI

#96
post #48

Some context for people who haven’t followed the full loop: Shazeer was a long-time Google researcher, joined Google in 2000, and was one of the co-authors of “Attention Is All You Need.” He left Google in 2021 to co-found Character.AI. In 2024, Google brought him and some Character.AI researchers back via a licensing/talent deal with Character.AI (reportedly around $2.7B). He was then made a Gemini co-lead. Now he’s…

[flagged]

Re: Noam Shazeer Joins OpenAI

#97
post #26
post #17

Noam Shazeer was one of the lead authors of the seminal paper "Attention Is All You Need", which introduced the transformer architecture. (From Wikipedia)

This understates his criticality. The author list was randomized, but the critical idea was truly his. Wonder what this says about GDM …

I don't know we can just say things now. Ah we're on the internet

Re: Noam Shazeer Joins OpenAI

#98
post #10

Wow. What could possibly have caused him to quit so soon after coming back? I hope this is not accurate but I'm afraid it is: https://x.com/signulll/status/2067446889956430273

If I had to make a guess, money played a role lol.

He is close or already a billionaire, not sure much more money will be do much heavy-lifting

Re: Noam Shazeer Joins OpenAI

#99
post #45

https://old.reddit.com/r/singularity/comments/1u8xc9m/most_l... Seems like there are some insights here! edit: it seems the post has been removed but comments are viewable. 1 liner summary: To put it lightly, the dude was politically outspoken and held strong beliefs.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/google-cracks-down-posts... seems to have some context
Post reply on HN