Years ago we want to do this and I didn't know any tool for it. I develop the application internally and we used wget mirroring to statically deploy it. Initially I thought it would suck but turns out wget is way better than I thought. With the combination of ssh etc. We build a simple script that deploys takes mirror of the website and deploys it. After about 5-6 years, it's still in production with no issues. Inter…
That sounds pretty cool. Have you considered publishing it under an open-source license?
Poll: What's your favorite static site generator?
91–100 of 124 posts
Re: Poll: What's your favorite static site generator?
#92Re: Poll: What's your favorite static site generator?
#93My own : https://gitorious.org/fugitive ;-).
Re: Poll: What's your favorite static site generator?
#94Hammer http://hammerformac.com/
Re: Poll: What's your favorite static site generator?
#95Webby ( http://webby.rubyforge.org/ ) Branch with ruby 1.9 fixes is at https://github.com/namelessjon/webby It is not under active development, but is for me feature-complete, stable and incredibly flexible. Advantages are: - pure ruby (no liquid templates needed) - each page has its own subdirectory where one can put images, scripts etc; your article becomes a 'package'. - chained templating filters; you can do erb-…
I tried something else at some point; I forget what, but it was more complicated, so I stuck with Webby.
Extending it is just easy. I've been using it to create mobi and epub files from Textile, as well as plain old Web sites. I think I use it for pretty much every site I have that isn't hitting a database, and even with those I probably have a static section built using Webby.
Re: Poll: What's your favorite static site generator?
#96emacs + org-mode + org-public
I've been trying to get org-publish + org-blog working recently, but haven't had time to tie it all together right.
Re: Poll: What's your favorite static site generator?
#97Docpad is really, really a great static generator. It doesn't use a lot of files, its file architecture is easy to understand, and it's node, so I don't have to hack with ruby versions.
My advice to other people considering making a static site generator - please don't make another compiler or caching layer just like the rest, anyone can do that. But if you want to make a large difference, one that you can't do alone, then see if you can team up with an existing project, they'd certainly welcome your insights and probably have a ton of ideas already - the conversations will always be valuable for all parties involved, and the end result for the world will be much better quality solutions rather than just merely more solutions.
Cheers, Ben.