Live data from Hacker News

Poll: What's your favorite static site generator?

news.ycombinator.com

91–100 of 124 posts

Re: Poll: What's your favorite static site generator?

#91
post #24

Years ago we want to do this and I didn't know any tool for it. I develop the application internally and we used wget mirroring to statically deploy it. Initially I thought it would suck but turns out wget is way better than I thought. With the combination of ssh etc. We build a simple script that deploys takes mirror of the website and deploys it. After about 5-6 years, it's still in production with no issues. Inter…

That sounds pretty cool. Have you considered publishing it under an open-source license?

I haven't actually, mostly making something open source takes time, if you don't have that extra time pretty much no one will use it. (at least that's my experience)

Re: Poll: What's your favorite static site generator?

#95
post #58

Webby ( http://webby.rubyforge.org/ ) Branch with ruby 1.9 fixes is at https://github.com/namelessjon/webby It is not under active development, but is for me feature-complete, stable and incredibly flexible. Advantages are: - pure ruby (no liquid templates needed) - each page has its own subdirectory where one can put images, scripts etc; your article becomes a 'package'. - chained templating filters; you can do erb-…

Another Webby user here. I forked the repo when I learned it was no longer maintained and I got tired of patching string.rb with "#encoding: UTF-8" whenever I was installing the gem someplace. :)

I tried something else at some point; I forget what, but it was more complicated, so I stuck with Webby.

Extending it is just easy. I've been using it to create mobi and epub files from Textile, as well as plain old Web sites. I think I use it for pretty much every site I have that isn't hitting a database, and even with those I probably have a static section built using Webby.

Re: Poll: What's your favorite static site generator?

#97
post #86

Docpad is really, really a great static generator. It doesn't use a lot of files, its file architecture is easy to understand, and it's node, so I don't have to hack with ruby versions.

Author of DocPad here. For a bit of history, DocPad was created 2 years ago now out of my utter frustration with all the other static site generators - frustration from not being able to use it for anything besides trivial use cases (Jekyll is the worst offender here). Building DocPad, it's goal has always been to set you free, ensuring you never hit another brick wall or constrain yourself. That's why we're seeing it used for such an awesome wide range of use cases easily and freely - personal sites, company sites, huge corporate sites, web applications, chat servers, whatever. Because of its plugin system and that it is built with express.js, you can extend it easily as well as add dynamic (re-render on each request) abilities when needed. Well worth checking it out if you got a while, here is a great intro video to it: https://vimeo.com/53755097

My advice to other people considering making a static site generator - please don't make another compiler or caching layer just like the rest, anyone can do that. But if you want to make a large difference, one that you can't do alone, then see if you can team up with an existing project, they'd certainly welcome your insights and probably have a ton of ideas already - the conversations will always be valuable for all parties involved, and the end result for the world will be much better quality solutions rather than just merely more solutions.

Cheers, Ben.

Re: Poll: What's your favorite static site generator?

#98
post #96

emacs + org-mode + org-public

org-public? Never heard of it.. any tips/links on setup? I've been trying to get org-publish + org-blog working recently, but haven't had time to tie it all together right.

yes, org-publish. i have no clue how I managed to mispell it.
Post reply on HN