Live data from Hacker News

Has AI already killed self-help nonfiction books?

tim.blog

91–100 of 513 posts

Re: Has AI already killed self-help nonfiction books?

#91
post #76
post #73

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I thought the explanation for podcasts was people who drive to and from work, and don't care for current radio shows.

More than just your commute. Any downtime where you are doing a mindless chore is prime podcast time.

Personally, I don't care for podcasts much around the house. I listen to them much less now that I don't commute.

Re: Has AI already killed self-help nonfiction books?

#92
In my corner of the internet people started to recommend reading fiction rather than self-help. Books like the count of montecristo for example, where the characters overcome through perseverance, patience and planning.

The criticism of self-help books in my little internet bubble is that if you've read one you've read them all. So why not go for works of fiction that are time-tested and are greatly entertaining and nourishing?

Re: Has AI already killed self-help nonfiction books?

#93

Self-help non-fiction books killed themselves by focusing on entertainment, in the form of amusing anecdotes, rather than substance. Most self-help books could be reduced to a 3-by-5 card without losing any of the core information.

Conversely: the self-help nonfiction book existed because it was the only practical way to monetize "good advice" or "good ideas" at scale. Now you can do a podcast or a youtube series and try to make money from advertising/affiliates/etc, but for a very long time, "buy my book" was the only game in town

Re: Has AI already killed self-help nonfiction books?

#94
I'm going to admit that I tend to hit a brick wall when these books tell me I need to fill out a worksheet if I really want to make a difference. You're telling me I have to do homework now? But ai can give me feedback on my thoughts anyway, directly what I'm interested in, and provide sources, even though it's probably patronizing me? Not a difficult decision.

Re: Has AI already killed self-help nonfiction books?

#95
post #86
post #6

I never understood how anyone could write more than 40 pages of “self help”. Especially not for a general audience. All self help boils down to the very foundation of your worldview, all other advice stems from it.

It depends on the topic, of course. I have a self-help book for my computer science students that talks about the best way to get a computer science bachelor's it weighs in at 64 pages. It's too small to print, but it really doesn't need to be any bigger.

A lot of non-fiction fits in 50-100 pages or so. Longer than a magazine article. But it's not publishable through a publisher if it's less than 250-300 pages. One of the reasons I probably won't work through a publisher any longer.

Re: Has AI already killed self-help nonfiction books?

#97

Earlier quoted context omitted.

the man leveraged the fact that his name was the same as Andrew Carnegie (having no relation) to launch a publishing empire. it was hacks from the beginning

Highly recommend "If Books Could Kill" https://bsky.app/profile/ifbookspod.bsky.social It really is all the same book.

All the writers that I love to hate - hariri, gladwell! Will give it a listen

Re: Has AI already killed self-help nonfiction books?

#99

Personally, I see the self-help industry dying because people are starting to realize that it’s just a network of individuals selling products, promoting each other’s products, and creating new avenues to sell more products. I refer to it as the “self-help mafia.” Tim Ferriss kind of created it.

you've giving people way too much credit here. People never start to realise en-masse.

Re: Has AI already killed self-help nonfiction books?

#100
post #23

> Find your 1,000 True Fans. If you started off doing this well but have meandered, it’s time to revisit. Get very clear on who those 1,000 people are. Well this is the difficult part. You can 10x the number of followers and still have less than 50 true fans. On the actual content, I am actually not surprised at all. These AI systems are surprisingly convincing when giving personal advise - for better or worse.

followers is a shit metric that only advertisers care for but they also want like 50-100k bare minimum. You need to find 1k people who are willing to give you money, or go out of their way to advocate for you.
Post reply on HN