Earlier quoted context omitted.
This doesn't really seem relevant, nor does it seem credible that only Democrats are ever tempted to use trickery to make crime rates seem better than they are.
https://abc7news.com/post/report-finds-lack-police-efficienc... https://abc7.com/post/george-gascon-los-angeles-district-att...
U.S. to dismantle system tracking Atlantic currents that are at risk of collapse
91–100 of 540 posts
Re: U.S. to dismantle system tracking Atlantic currents that are at risk of collapse
#92What really puts all of this into perspective for me is I work in academia and one of my friends works for a defense contractor. He told me the maintenance cost per flight hour of F-35 was a bit more than $40k, which is significantly more than I make in a year as a grad student. It's crazy basic science is what's been the focus of so many cuts while it's so cheap.
Re: U.S. to dismantle system tracking Atlantic currents that are at risk of collapse
#93[flagged]
Re: U.S. to dismantle system tracking Atlantic currents that are at risk of collapse
#94What really puts all of this into perspective for me is I work in academia and one of my friends works for a defense contractor. He told me the maintenance cost per flight hour of F-35 was a bit more than $40k, which is significantly more than I make in a year as a grad student. It's crazy basic science is what's been the focus of so many cuts while it's so cheap.
Looked at from a policy maker's viewpoint, things look very different.
Re: U.S. to dismantle system tracking Atlantic currents that are at risk of collapse
#95Re: U.S. to dismantle system tracking Atlantic currents that are at risk of collapse
#96Earlier quoted context omitted.
Can you think of any economically valuable reason why it might be important to know about weather trends or events in advance? Any at all?
[flagged]
Re: U.S. to dismantle system tracking Atlantic currents that are at risk of collapse
#97Earlier quoted context omitted.
That makes no sense whatsoever. Voting for Trump (or anyone with an R by their name) is wrong; sitting out a vote is wrong. Why save all the blame for the side that actually put up resistance, however ineptly?
> Why save all the blame for the side that actually put up resistance Resistance is one definition, I guess. A very loose definition. I'd call it what it was. Career sociopaths decided to put a career sociopath on the ballot instead of someone the left's citizens would actually like.
Re: U.S. to dismantle system tracking Atlantic currents that are at risk of collapse
#98> Democrats in Congress have said they will “fight” plans to dismantle the system Putting “fight” into quotes here is terrific amount of low level shade for a scientific publication. chef’s kiss
Re: U.S. to dismantle system tracking Atlantic currents that are at risk of collapse
#99Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Why save all the blame for the side that actually put up resistance Resistance is one definition, I guess. A very loose definition. I'd call it what it was. Career sociopaths decided to put a career sociopath on the ballot instead of someone the left's citizens would actually like.
[flagged]
Re: U.S. to dismantle system tracking Atlantic currents that are at risk of collapse
#100Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
Let's say you're an evil capitalist bastard. How would you capture that value?
But lets say, for the hell of it, we take a wild guess and presume that to be economically valuable it has to be if not easily tradeable at least actionable, but for whatever reason the hypothetical here is it's only useful in the US if the government does it. I would presume, though not propose, they could sell it to US enemies, such as China. Now I am not promoting treasonous activities, but I'm quite sure, some capitalists would happily do them.