Live data from Hacker News

Tulip mania: when a single flower was worth more than a house (2025)

dutchreview.com

91–100 of 135 posts

Re: Tulip mania: when a single flower was worth more than a house (2025)

#91
post #62

Earlier quoted context omitted.

So many of these articles get it completely wrong. Economically. People weren't going crazy for tulips just because, the government had incentivized investment in tulips. The government at the time basically told people that they could not lose money on investing tulips. It should be a story about governments misallocating resources. That's it, but people quit. Keep twisting it into a story of psychology and mania wh…

Does it make sense to talk about "the government" in this age? It probably misguides us more than informs us. I've always felt the perception of government at the time is closer to our perception of the captain of the local football team - at best distant and upholding the honor of the village, at worst a thief with a title - rather than how we view it today. Authority of information lay with the church. Maybe replac…

Eh 1630s in not the bronze age. The Netherlands was a republic, with quite a complex state apparatus. Sure it wasn't a democracy but there still was a government.

Re: Tulip mania: when a single flower was worth more than a house (2025)

#92
post #85

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There are governments at many levels. I don't think a city of more than 100,000 would be possible without a substantial amount of civil management. Deciding with bits are for streets and which bits are for buildings needs an arbiter of som sort for starters. If a place had a sewer it probably had a government. Sometimes I like to recall that somewhere in Tenochtitlan there must have been some Aztec administrator doin…

Not sure you need any of that. My entire 'city' is private property including the streets. There is absolutely no one to manage them, no HOA, absolutely nothing. If you can't drive on them you literally have to bust out a tractor and fix it. There is no public water or sewer, no public utilities, so you build them yourself and the amortized cost is easily half of paying some asshole working for the state to administe…

So you can build a house in the middle of a street?

If someone tries to stop you, by what authority? If they can stop you, there's your government.

More than 100,000 people?

Even Kowloon had a degree of management by criminal groups.

Re: Tulip mania: when a single flower was worth more than a house (2025)

#93

Maybe we should update our lexicon to "NFT mania" –– far more people lost money in that phenomenon.

Its funny how popular stories about 'dumb' behavior in the past is, while we have much worse examples from our time. Past economic bubbles have nothing on our modern ones as you point out. And stuff like the romans use of lead is also nothing compared to our used of the stuff in industry and transport.

Re: Tulip mania: when a single flower was worth more than a house (2025)

#94
For the tulip mania, as well as other manias, I very strongly recommend: "Memoirs of Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds" by Charles Mackay[1]

Very informative and a very enjoyable read.

[1] https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/24518

Re: Tulip mania: when a single flower was worth more than a house (2025)

#95

Earlier quoted context omitted.

So many of these articles get it completely wrong. Economically. People weren't going crazy for tulips just because, the government had incentivized investment in tulips. The government at the time basically told people that they could not lose money on investing tulips. It should be a story about governments misallocating resources. That's it, but people quit. Keep twisting it into a story of psychology and mania wh…

The "government" didn't do much at all, there was no real oversight or guarantee like there is today. The whole concept was novel at the time so there was no law and there were no real procedures. The Dutch Republic may not have had an official king, it also sure wasn't a democracy with real, independent institutions or anything like that. The country was led by a democracy-lite system of nobility/rich people that fe…

Mania has meant madness since ancient times. Its an Ionian Greek word.

Re: Tulip mania: when a single flower was worth more than a house (2025)

#96
post #92

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not sure you need any of that. My entire 'city' is private property including the streets. There is absolutely no one to manage them, no HOA, absolutely nothing. If you can't drive on them you literally have to bust out a tractor and fix it. There is no public water or sewer, no public utilities, so you build them yourself and the amortized cost is easily half of paying some asshole working for the state to administe…

So you can build a house in the middle of a street? If someone tries to stop you, by what authority? If they can stop you, there's your government. More than 100,000 people? Even Kowloon had a degree of management by criminal groups.

I'm not claiming there is literally no government, I'm claiming they are not acting in planning or maintenance ('civil management') capacity. If you have an easement contract to travel on a 'street' and someone violates it by building a house on it you can still sue them but the government has nothing to do with planning that. The population is not quite 100k but also not an order of magnitude lower either.

Re: Tulip mania: when a single flower was worth more than a house (2025)

#97

Earlier quoted context omitted.

So many of these articles get it completely wrong. Economically. People weren't going crazy for tulips just because, the government had incentivized investment in tulips. The government at the time basically told people that they could not lose money on investing tulips. It should be a story about governments misallocating resources. That's it, but people quit. Keep twisting it into a story of psychology and mania wh…

The "government" didn't do much at all, there was no real oversight or guarantee like there is today. The whole concept was novel at the time so there was no law and there were no real procedures. The Dutch Republic may not have had an official king, it also sure wasn't a democracy with real, independent institutions or anything like that. The country was led by a democracy-lite system of nobility/rich people that fe…

Sounds a lot like bitcoin.

Re: Tulip mania: when a single flower was worth more than a house (2025)

#98

Maybe we should update our lexicon to "NFT mania" –– far more people lost money in that phenomenon.

I made my first fortune on Beanie Babies in '97/98. Every decade has its fads. Bet a few guys made a couple of million on Labubus. I was hauling around bags of cash with hundreds of thousands of dollars in them.

Re: Tulip mania: when a single flower was worth more than a house (2025)

#99
post #85

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There are governments at many levels. I don't think a city of more than 100,000 would be possible without a substantial amount of civil management. Deciding with bits are for streets and which bits are for buildings needs an arbiter of som sort for starters. If a place had a sewer it probably had a government. Sometimes I like to recall that somewhere in Tenochtitlan there must have been some Aztec administrator doin…

Not sure you need any of that. My entire 'city' is private property including the streets. There is absolutely no one to manage them, no HOA, absolutely nothing. If you can't drive on them you literally have to bust out a tractor and fix it. There is no public water or sewer, no public utilities, so you build them yourself and the amortized cost is easily half of paying some asshole working for the state to administe…

I really want to know where this is.
Post reply on HN