Incident with Actions and Pages
91–100 of 407 posts
Re: Incident with Actions and Pages
#92Earlier quoted context omitted.
Founder of Depot here. To my knowledge, we are the first engine to support different syntaxes in this compatible way via Depot CI [0]. Great time to try it out and let us know your thoughts! We’ve built a lot of cool stuff into it like parallel steps, custom images, and a full CLI/API interface so you can literally everything without going into the web app. [0] https://depot.dev
Are you able to bring your own runners? Our org is heavily invested in self-hosted runners at this point and have gotten a pretty tremendous value from it. I think we'd be wise to get away from GitHub's control plane but keep running jobs in our own infra.
Re: Incident with Actions and Pages
#93Re: Incident with Actions and Pages
#94Are there any GitHub Actions-compatible CI services out there that don't rely on their infrastructure? I know of depot's but no others; are these resilient to these outages or do they still lose functionality? I imagine the latter but I don't know.
there are a couple and have very good reputation - though I've never used them https://www.blacksmith.sh/ and https://runs-on.com/ They also say that they're much cheaper than github
Re: Incident with Actions and Pages
#95Re: Incident with Actions and Pages
#96Re: Incident with Actions and Pages
#97Re: Incident with Actions and Pages
#98Re: Incident with Actions and Pages
#99Re: Incident with Actions and Pages
#100I've started spending each github outage planning our move to an alternative. I guess I'm not alone. Where are you all moving?
Even though it's selfhosted and we don't have a dedicated infrastructure team, I don't remember it ever being down in the last 12 years I have been working here.