Earlier quoted context omitted.
If anything, it reads to me as a proactive rebuttal of complaints that they don't allow LLMs; they're definitively stating that they do allow using them for very specific purposes.
Needs to be "solicited" from a senior dev. How many requests for ai code do you think they will be making?
LLM Policy for Rust Compiler
91–94 of 94 posts
Re: LLM Policy for Rust Compiler
#92Earlier quoted context omitted.
"allows the important stuff like LLMs writing code so long as you disclose." Are you sure? It says: "It's fine to use LLMs to answer questions, analyze, distill, refine, check, suggest, review. But not to *create*."
Yes. The policy is pretty clear on what the rules are for LLM generated code. You need a reviewer to agree to review LLM generated code, you need to read the code yourself, etc.
That exception is experimental and somewhat limited; Only allows "well tested, high-quality" PRs on parts of the codebase that have a low probability of causing soundness issues, and it has a seperate review process with much higher standards.
And it requires the reviewer to agree to the use of LLMs ahead of time, before the PR is opened.
IMO, it has a high likelihood of degrading to a closed system, where some programmers with a good track record have little issue merging LLM generated PRs, while anyone without a reputation will struggle to even open an ai-assisted PR.
Re: LLM Policy for Rust Compiler
#93[flagged]
i'm not a man.
https://github.com/jank-lang/jank?tab=contributing-ov-file#a...
Re: LLM Policy for Rust Compiler
#94Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
You are free to believe what you want. If you find it that hard to keep those feelings to yourself in the context of contributing to rust, and are too stubborn to make a one character change to pronouns when you’re addressing people, I have to imagine that you’re utterly incapable of working in any professional context, where you’re expected to conform to many more things that make less sense. This seems like a probl…
That sex determines if you're a man or a woman, and gender is irrelevant? I do, but I'm being asked to believe the inverse, or to act as if I do.
> many more things that make less sense
I can think of nothing remotely like being asked to call a man a woman. Id be happy to be wrong about that, but this is nothing like homosexuality, racism or any other "ism" We've seen before.