Um, I realize the Trump administration doesn't pay a lot of attention to what it does and does not have authority to do, but I'm having trouble imagining what they'd even claim their authority was...
White House Considers Vetting A.I. Models Before They Are Released
91–100 of 112 posts
Re: White House Considers Vetting A.I. Models Before They Are Released
#92Earlier quoted context omitted.
~That’s bullshit, the regulations do not mention USB–C, they mention it has to be a common standard, with evaluation every few years~ Edit: I was wrong > I remember Google maps existing on iOS before Apple Maps was ever released You couldn’t change the default map app on iOS before the EU forced Apple to allow default apps to be configured. That’s what the person you responded to was claiming, and they are correct
It has to be a USB-C physical receptor and must use USB protocols. be equipped with the USB Type-C receptacle, as described in the standard EN IEC 62680-1-3:2021 “Universal serial bus interfaces for data and power – Part 1-3: Common components – USB Type-C® Cable and Connector Specification”, and that receptacle shall remain accessible and operational at all times; incorporate the USB Power Delivery, as described in…
Re: White House Considers Vetting A.I. Models Before They Are Released
#93Earlier quoted context omitted.
Or they could not collect unnecessary user data. They chose to waste users' time. If you don't like that we can always punish them for those billions of wasted hours.
Collecting user usage data is the basic step to actually understanding how your users use your website so you can improve it. It's so standard that even the official EU government website collects this kind of data and has a cookie prompt. And you know what irks me the most? These politicians weren't smart enough to write a law that does this to all digital places. Yes, they only wrote this law for websites while app…
That’s wrong, you can check the EDPB guidelines[0], consent is required for mobile apps, desktop programs, SDKs, etc
The collection isn’t the issue. As long as it is done with consent. Which is why the EU website is showing you the banner. You also do not need to prompt if you do not share with 3rd parties and for what is considered essential for your services to function
0: https://www.edpb.europa.eu/our-work-tools/our-documents/guid...
Re: White House Considers Vetting A.I. Models Before They Are Released
#94They will have to "correctly" answer who is the best president, is the straight of Hormuz blocked, and how tall should the ballroom be.
2) This will allow China to eat America's AI lunch, just as it's doing with renewables, automobiles, and manufacturing in general
Re: White House Considers Vetting A.I. Models Before They Are Released
#95Earlier quoted context omitted.
The regulations also gave us "USB-C everywhere" and the possibility to use a different map app than Apple maps on iOS. More to come.
and the possibility to use a different map app than Apple maps on iOS iPhones have had Google Maps since day one. No regulation or EU needed.
Re: White House Considers Vetting A.I. Models Before They Are Released
#96Earlier quoted context omitted.
The regulations also gave us "USB-C everywhere" and the possibility to use a different map app than Apple maps on iOS. More to come.
And possibly hindered innovation for a newer, better port because USB-C everywhere is required. I remember Google maps existing on iOS before Apple Maps was ever released.
Re: White House Considers Vetting A.I. Models Before They Are Released
#97To make that very clear, contrast the loud public blog posts about how "Chinese Companies" were using multiple accounts to distill model data, and the complete silence when Elon Musk admitted in court they do the same for Grok.
(The side issue that LLM outputs are probably only protected under contract law, not as something that is copyrightable is a distraction here BTW)
Re: White House Considers Vetting A.I. Models Before They Are Released
#98They will have to "correctly" answer who is the best president, is the straight of Hormuz blocked, and how tall should the ballroom be.
Re: White House Considers Vetting A.I. Models Before They Are Released
#99More inside trading and poly market betting
Re: White House Considers Vetting A.I. Models Before They Are Released
#100Earlier quoted context omitted.
Not the OP, but: - China is the largest open weight provider, with Mistral and Cohere delivering a few other models. There isn’t much else internationally - (I think OP is suggesting) this would effectively ban Chinese models in the US, which would be an interesting case. Who knows if they could have theirs reviewed, or if we’ll see another FCC approved router situation. - that Chinese models are censored is a very c…
> - that Chinese models are censored is a very common criticism. If American models are also censored that looks bad. It's even worse than that for American models. As an American, if I want to run a model locally and have to choose a censored model I will choose a Chinese censored model over an American censored model especially if it is the Trump administration doing the American censoring. Chinese censorship is mo…