Live data from Hacker News

HashiCorp co-founder says GitHub 'no longer a place for serious work'

theregister.com

91–100 of 243 posts

Re: HashiCorp co-founder says GitHub 'no longer a place for serious work'

#93

everyone knew M$ would ruin github the fake surprise is so fake

M$ bought GH almost a decad ago. Instability is more due to mainstream traffic, combined (+ AI automation pushes on pointless repos) than some slow motion evil mastermind plot. Hanlon's razor applies.

No one forced them to migrate GitHub to switch to React. And the atrocious sleep bug in Actions long predates the AI gold rush.

Re: HashiCorp co-founder says GitHub 'no longer a place for serious work'

#95
post #59
post #23

so where should people move to instead

I wonder if there's a place for something like matrix, but for repositories (or maybe matrix protocol can handle that?). A world where we have selfhosted, saas, etc, but all interlinked and searchable? Say I find a project on gitlab, I want to contribute to, I checkout to my personal server (or someone elses hosted), and raise a pr back to original repo. I know it doesn't answer your question, just thinking aloud rea…

https://tangled.org/ is close to what you are describing

Re: HashiCorp co-founder says GitHub 'no longer a place for serious work'

#99
post #89
post #34

You gotta admire journalists. Such a one punch sentence that distills the message with a little bit of dramatic flair. got damn, anyone got recommendations on how to write like a journalist ?

Take a sentence for a title, replace one of the verbs with SLAM, LAMBAST and CLAPS BACK, you're hired. The rest of the article can be AI generated, don't fret about it.

Titles can be genrated as well, just tell the LLM whether your readers love drama and witch hunts or are pseudo intellectuals. It'll come up with the correct framing.

Re: HashiCorp co-founder says GitHub 'no longer a place for serious work'

#100
post #46

Earlier quoted context omitted.

We were on self-hosted Gitlab but after a merger were forced to Github. Navigation feels painful in comparison and basic features such as commit graph are now behind more expensive tiers.

Interesting! I worked with Gitlab and I also thought it was quite clunky. If it was not for the stability issues GitHub is fine. Any other alternatives to GH or GL?

Self-hosting with open source code:

- SourceHut: https://sr.ht/~sircmpwn/sourcehut/

- Forgejo (used by Codeberg, etc.): https://forgejo.org/

Post reply on HN