Is Gitlab doing better at this point? Or where do they stand?
HashiCorp co-founder says GitHub 'no longer a place for serious work'
91–100 of 243 posts
Re: HashiCorp co-founder says GitHub 'no longer a place for serious work'
#92Re: HashiCorp co-founder says GitHub 'no longer a place for serious work'
#93everyone knew M$ would ruin github the fake surprise is so fake
M$ bought GH almost a decad ago. Instability is more due to mainstream traffic, combined (+ AI automation pushes on pointless repos) than some slow motion evil mastermind plot. Hanlon's razor applies.
Re: HashiCorp co-founder says GitHub 'no longer a place for serious work'
#94Re: HashiCorp co-founder says GitHub 'no longer a place for serious work'
#95so where should people move to instead
I wonder if there's a place for something like matrix, but for repositories (or maybe matrix protocol can handle that?). A world where we have selfhosted, saas, etc, but all interlinked and searchable? Say I find a project on gitlab, I want to contribute to, I checkout to my personal server (or someone elses hosted), and raise a pr back to original repo. I know it doesn't answer your question, just thinking aloud rea…
Re: HashiCorp co-founder says GitHub 'no longer a place for serious work'
#96Re: HashiCorp co-founder says GitHub 'no longer a place for serious work'
#97Re: HashiCorp co-founder says GitHub 'no longer a place for serious work'
#98everyone knew M$ would ruin github the fake surprise is so fake
Re: HashiCorp co-founder says GitHub 'no longer a place for serious work'
#99You gotta admire journalists. Such a one punch sentence that distills the message with a little bit of dramatic flair. got damn, anyone got recommendations on how to write like a journalist ?
Take a sentence for a title, replace one of the verbs with SLAM, LAMBAST and CLAPS BACK, you're hired. The rest of the article can be AI generated, don't fret about it.
Re: HashiCorp co-founder says GitHub 'no longer a place for serious work'
#100Earlier quoted context omitted.
We were on self-hosted Gitlab but after a merger were forced to Github. Navigation feels painful in comparison and basic features such as commit graph are now behind more expensive tiers.
Interesting! I worked with Gitlab and I also thought it was quite clunky. If it was not for the stability issues GitHub is fine. Any other alternatives to GH or GL?
- SourceHut: https://sr.ht/~sircmpwn/sourcehut/
- Forgejo (used by Codeberg, etc.): https://forgejo.org/