Live data from Hacker News

A programmable watch you can actually wear

hackster.io

91–100 of 137 posts

Re: A programmable watch you can actually wear

#91
post #54

Earlier quoted context omitted.

an esp32 on an 1100mah battery will last years on deep sleep, and about a day with wifi on and in high power modes. a pixel watch 4 says they last 30 hours , ambiguously. they use a battery less than half the size. in reality with constant use they'll drop dead in 6 hours. the thing is clunky and heavy , anyway -- so if it lasts as long as an off the shelf watch who cares? also, the primary reason : lilygo shoves ESP…

Several Garmin watches last for weeks (24 days full charge, actual 1-2 weeks with heavy gps and fitness tracking), and I struggle to understand why consumers accept anything less. It seems like consumers don't realize what's available.

I think cost is one factor. I have a Vivoactive 4 and I love it but it has a reported battery life of 8 days and I get maybe half that with regular run tracking. I'm guessing the 24 days/1-2 weeks is for a considerably more expensive model.

Re: A programmable watch you can actually wear

#93
post #70

I would buy it if it had wifi. A (decent to wear) watch with wifi would be awesome. Tons of ideas for apps I would build for myself Ofc, im excluding apple

It's an ESP32, it has wifi.

Yes. Though not all ESP32 variants have wifi.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ESP32#Features

Re: A programmable watch you can actually wear

#94

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Several Garmin watches last for weeks (24 days full charge, actual 1-2 weeks with heavy gps and fitness tracking), and I struggle to understand why consumers accept anything less. It seems like consumers don't realize what's available.

I think cost is one factor. I have a Vivoactive 4 and I love it but it has a reported battery life of 8 days and I get maybe half that with regular run tracking. I'm guessing the 24 days/1-2 weeks is for a considerably more expensive model.

[deleted]

Re: A programmable watch you can actually wear

#96
post #63
post #20

I like a good smart watch and I appreciate open source, but an ESP32 isn't a great pick when low power consumption is important and the device is going to be communicating regularly. I'm surprised LILYGO went that direction in a watch form factor.

An advantage of ESP32-S3 could be that it seems possible to run Linux on it.

I for one like it is ESP-IDF with FreeRTOS, at least we get some variation.

Re: A programmable watch you can actually wear

#98
post #87

s/Watch/Smartwatch Regular DYI watches aren't big news... (I would be over the moon for a DIY smartwatch with zero AI and e-ink screen.)

Watchy fits the bill: https://watchy.sqfmi.com/ I have one, its a bit bulkier than I'd thought it would be, but its a fine piece of timekeeping ..

I had one, broke 2 screens before I gave up wearing it... It's really not meant to be work in daily life, which is sad because an e-paper screen makes a lot of sense on a watch.
Post reply on HN