91–100 of 138 posts
If all you can see is the following tab, then any ragebait that gets in your way is much more actionable, simply unfollow or mute whoever got it on your feed.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
America and Japan have been discussing BBQ for about a week and. And the Japanese have just discovered ranch dressing. It's hilarious to watch. Russians recently joined in and, they're fuckin' hilarious in a way that only Russians could be: https://imgur.com/GaTnQk7.jpg The people who hate Musk/X always out themselves by flagrantly lying about it/him.
Is this the X marketing team or something? You’ve posted about discussing BBQ with different nations twice in the comments here
If you're rejecting X out of hate for Musk, you're simply missing out on some really cool stuff happening.
The BBQ thing a huge international thing. I learned that the Japanese have a term that translates as "food terrorism": pictures of mouthwatering food that you only get to look at, not eat.
It was a bigger deal than even I'm conveying and honestly heartwarming.
Why, when you could just not use X though?
What I don't understand how difficult it seems to be for some people to simply ignore topics or people they don't like. If an algorithmic feed keeps presenting you with certain topics, it's largely because you're engaging with them. Isn't that on you? I don't use Twitter but I use Tiktok and you know what I do when I see something I'm not interested in? I scroll up. If it's someone who never has anything interesting…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Is this the X marketing team or something? You’ve posted about discussing BBQ with different nations twice in the comments here
It completely took over twitter for like a week and it was endearing. I made this myself (with grok's help) to celebrate: https://i.imgur.com/MG9mUxW.jpeg If you're rejecting X out of hate for Musk, you're simply missing out on some really cool stuff happening. The BBQ thing a huge international thing. I learned that the Japanese have a term that translates as "food terrorism": pictures of mouthwatering food that you…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
> you're going to end up systematically misinformed on political topics that people find outrageous. That sounds... fine?
I would emphasize mis informed, not un informed. If Policy X has 30% of people politely supportive, 20% of people politely opposed, and 50% of people incandescently furious about it, you're going to mistakenly think it has majority support.
