This is such a good decision. It's one of those things that's incredibly confusing initially, but you get so used to it over the years, I even forgot it was a quirk. In the modern world there is no plausible scenario where this would compromise a password that wouldn't otherwise also be compromised with equivalent effort.
Yes… We're in the same room as the target… Let's look at their screen and see how long their password is. Or, we could just look at the keyboard as they type and gain a lot more information. In an absolute sense not showing anything is safer. But it never really matters and just acts as a paper cut for all.
Ubuntu 26.04 Ends 46 Years of Silent sudo Passwords
91–100 of 421 posts
Re: Ubuntu 26.04 Ends 46 Years of Silent sudo Passwords
#92Earlier quoted context omitted.
> It is still a good decision, an one character password is useless from a security standpoint. Only if length is known. Which is true now. So it opens the gates to try passwords of specific known length.
If you are brute forcing passwords, knowing the length only reduces the number of passwords to try by like 1 hundredth.
Re: Ubuntu 26.04 Ends 46 Years of Silent sudo Passwords
#93Earlier quoted context omitted.
Courage to be different is an open door to creativity. Yes, it means going in a wrong direction sometimes as well: that's why it takes courage — success ain't guaranteed and you might be mocked or ridiculed when you fail. Still, Ubuntu got from zero to most-used Linux distribution on desktops and servers with much smaller investment than the incumbents who are sometimes only following (like Red Hat). So perhaps they…
Ubuntu became the most used because they were the first to really dumb down the install process. No insult intended, it was my first distro as well. If you weren't around, it was rather stark. Most others had install media that just loaded a curses based install menu, asking you about partioning. Ubuntu gave you a live environment and graphical installer, which didn't ask any hard questions... way ahead of their time…
Re: Ubuntu 26.04 Ends 46 Years of Silent sudo Passwords
#94The number of times I've been stuck wondering if my keystrokes are registering properly for a sudo prompt over a high latency ssh connection. These servers I had an account setup too were, from what I observed, partially linked with the authentication mechanism used by the VPN and IAM services. Like they'd have this mandatory password reset process and sometimes sudo was set to that new password, other times it was w…
Re: Ubuntu 26.04 Ends 46 Years of Silent sudo Passwords
#95> sudo password is the same as their login password — one that already appears as visible placeholder dots on the graphical login screen. Hiding asterisks in the terminal while showing them at login is, in the developers’ estimation, security theatre. So hide the first one as well? But also, that's not true, not all terminal passwords are for local machine > Confusing — appears frozen So make it appear flashing? Stil…
Is there any reason to have this feature enabled for millions of desktop users vs enable by appropriately paranoid corporate IT departments?
Re: Ubuntu 26.04 Ends 46 Years of Silent sudo Passwords
#96Weird argument about the logging password forging the same in a gui. Because it certainly it not when logging in using a terminal locale or ssh for that matter
Either way, password lengths are exposed in virtually all scenarios except the Unix Terminal - and have caused 0 issues in practice. The default of hiding password inputs really is useless security theater, and always has been. The crazier part is Ubuntu using a pre-1.0 software suite instead of software that has been around for decades. The switch to Rust coreutils is far too early.
Do you have some data to back that up? Because I doubt it’s literally 0. I make this point because we shouldn’t talk about absolutes when discussing security.
Fo example, Knowing a password length does make it easier to crack a password. So it’s not strictly “security theatre”.
So the real question isn’t whether it has any security benefit; it’s more is the convenience greater than the risk it introduces.
Framing it like this is important because for technical users like us on HN, we’d obviously mostly say the convenience is negligible and thus are more focused on the security aspect of the change.
But for the average Desktop Ubuntu user, that convenience aspect is more pronounced.
This is why you’re going to see people argue against this change on HN. Simply put, different people have different risk appetites.
Re: Ubuntu 26.04 Ends 46 Years of Silent sudo Passwords
#97Why not just display a single character out of a changing set of characters such as / - \ | (starting with a random one from the set) after every character entered? That way you can be certain whether or not you entered a character but and observer can‘t tell how many characters your password has.
There was a software package a couple decades ago, I want to say it was Lotus Notes but I'm pretty sure it wasn't actually Lotus Notes but something of that ilk, that would show a small, random number of asterisks corresponding to each character entered. So you'd hit one key and maybe two asterisks would show up on screen. And kept track of them so if you deleted a character, it'd remove two. I thought that was kinda…
Re: Ubuntu 26.04 Ends 46 Years of Silent sudo Passwords
#98Earlier quoted context omitted.
Courage to be different is an open door to creativity. Yes, it means going in a wrong direction sometimes as well: that's why it takes courage — success ain't guaranteed and you might be mocked or ridiculed when you fail. Still, Ubuntu got from zero to most-used Linux distribution on desktops and servers with much smaller investment than the incumbents who are sometimes only following (like Red Hat). So perhaps they…
Ubuntu became the most used because they were the first to really dumb down the install process. No insult intended, it was my first distro as well. If you weren't around, it was rather stark. Most others had install media that just loaded a curses based install menu, asking you about partioning. Ubuntu gave you a live environment and graphical installer, which didn't ask any hard questions... way ahead of their time…
That is an urban myth relayed by people who weren't even using Ubuntu in its early days.
Other distros were as easy to install as Ubuntu even before Ubuntu was founded. Besides Ubuntu was using the then experimental debian installer you could already use with a regular debian. They just shipped it on the default CD image earlier than debian did.
What they did to be on top was using Mark shuttleworth's money to ship an insane amount of free install CDs to anyone asking for them which meant that for a small period of time, when most people were on dial up internet ISDN and shitty ADSL, Ubuntu went suddently to be the number one distro installed. A friend, family member or coworker was curious about Linux? You'd hand him one of the fifty Ubuntu CDs you had lying around. I know I was one of those handing out CDs left and right. It was a time when to get an install CD without broadband you'd have to buy a magazine, and you didn't get to choose which distro was featured each month, a book or a boxset (not available everywhere). Later all those many early ubuntu adopters became ubuntu evangelists.
But bar a few exceptions like slackware, debian with the default vanilla installer or gentoo, there was nothing particular about the ubuntu install experience compared to other distros. Mandrake, Corel Linux ans Xandrows for example provided super easy install experience even before Ubuntu became a thing.
Re: Ubuntu 26.04 Ends 46 Years of Silent sudo Passwords
#99Re: Ubuntu 26.04 Ends 46 Years of Silent sudo Passwords
#100Earlier quoted context omitted.
Courage to be different is an open door to creativity. Yes, it means going in a wrong direction sometimes as well: that's why it takes courage — success ain't guaranteed and you might be mocked or ridiculed when you fail. Still, Ubuntu got from zero to most-used Linux distribution on desktops and servers with much smaller investment than the incumbents who are sometimes only following (like Red Hat). So perhaps they…
Ubuntu became the most used because they were the first to really dumb down the install process. No insult intended, it was my first distro as well. If you weren't around, it was rather stark. Most others had install media that just loaded a curses based install menu, asking you about partioning. Ubuntu gave you a live environment and graphical installer, which didn't ask any hard questions... way ahead of their time…
Mir/Compiz/Snaps came much-much later (snaps are as much a mistake as flatpak is: they make sense, but are notoriously expensive to make; Unity was a better UX than Gnome Shell 3, but it did not pay...).
However, none of this explains Ubuntu's penetration on cloud servers.
Canonical was actually solving exactly the same problems Red Hat was, just with much lower investment. Their wins made them dominant, their losses still allowed them to pivot to new de facto standards (like systemd too).