Where are the most popular alternatives to Jira?
I'm interested in OSS alternatives, even if not as popular.
Atlassian to cut roughly 1,600 jobs in pivot to AI
91–100 of 320 posts
Re: Atlassian to cut roughly 1,600 jobs in pivot to AI
#92Earlier quoted context omitted.
Does it matter how someone gets their work done as long as its done on time? Why does using a specific tool matter?
To add to the speculation, it's possible that the people refusing to use it are working slower. Even if the code that they write is objectively better by any metric you'd like, humans can't really pump out code as fast as Claude or Codex can. If you can get something into "good enough" territory in 1/10th the time of someone who can get it into "great" territory, that is often worth it.
Re: Atlassian to cut roughly 1,600 jobs in pivot to AI
#93Layoffs because of AI make no sense to me. Imagine you own a company that is paid to deliver packages. You use horses and differentiate by delivering quicker than everyone else. Then cars are invented and everyone starts delivering packages faster. In what world does a healthy growing business react to this by laying off couriers "in a pivot to automotive transportation". Would a healthy business not switch everyone…
Re: Atlassian to cut roughly 1,600 jobs in pivot to AI
#94Please don't tell me that Jira is about to get even worse... I don't understand the AI layoffs; there's always an infinite supply of new work that could be done. Instead of firing 1600 people, why not have all of them use AI to produce more stuff and outrun their competitors. Presumably all their competitors also know about Claude as well, and a lot of these 1600 people will go work for them and use Claude. Unless th…
Re: Atlassian to cut roughly 1,600 jobs in pivot to AI
#95Atlassian is cutting another 1600 jobs because it needs to cut more jobs as it is a dying company with terrible products. But let's try to spin it up as if we were some kind of AI mavens who are reaping humongous increases in productivity due to our thought leadership in AI.
Re: Atlassian to cut roughly 1,600 jobs in pivot to AI
#96Atlassian is cutting another 1600 jobs because it needs to cut more jobs as it is a dying company with terrible products. But let's try to spin it up as if we were some kind of AI mavens who are reaping humongous increases in productivity due to our thought leadership in AI.
Tariffs
War in the Middle East
US economy that would likely be in recession if not for massive datacenter spend
Oil at ~$100
But we're laying people off because... AI
Re: Atlassian to cut roughly 1,600 jobs in pivot to AI
#97I can't wait for Atlassian physical sticky-notes to take over.
[Edit: grammo and formatting]
Re: Atlassian to cut roughly 1,600 jobs in pivot to AI
#98Atlassian is cutting another 1600 jobs because it needs to cut more jobs as it is a dying company with terrible products. But let's try to spin it up as if we were some kind of AI mavens who are reaping humongous increases in productivity due to our thought leadership in AI.
TBF they have made major improvements, IMHO, to Jira and Confluence over the past few years.
Re: Atlassian to cut roughly 1,600 jobs in pivot to AI
#99Layoffs because of AI make no sense to me. Imagine you own a company that is paid to deliver packages. You use horses and differentiate by delivering quicker than everyone else. Then cars are invented and everyone starts delivering packages faster. In what world does a healthy growing business react to this by laying off couriers "in a pivot to automotive transportation". Would a healthy business not switch everyone…
You need a very different skill set and culture for driving and maintaining cars than for driving and maintaining horses. I honestly think that for big changes like this (if you are willing to accept that AI is such), looking at it from the portfolio management angle, it makes more sense to just nuke the current operation and start a greenfield one.
Why? What was wrong with the 1600 people they sacked? Do they have a magical 1600-person hire pool with the AI skills they want?
Re: Atlassian to cut roughly 1,600 jobs in pivot to AI
#100Atlassian is cutting another 1600 jobs because it needs to cut more jobs as it is a dying company with terrible products. But let's try to spin it up as if we were some kind of AI mavens who are reaping humongous increases in productivity due to our thought leadership in AI.
To be clear, I agree with the terrible products part - but currently they are not dying because there is no alternative platform which is flexible, scalable and feature-complete enough. You may find alternatives for niches, like GitHub for software engineering, but the Atlassian stuff allows for knowledge transfer and familiarity across many many domains. I've seen it used anywhere from government burocracy to customer service and construction companies. They nailed the abstraction for flexible issue management, just the implementation is terrible.