[deleted]
Qwen3.5 Fine-Tuning Guide
91–100 of 118 posts
Re: Qwen3.5 Fine-Tuning Guide
#92What are some sample real world cases folks are using to fine tune their own small/medium models?
I am thinking to fine-tune it to recognize better my handwriting. It already works quite well by default, but my writing is just horrible, so it got trouble sometimes.
Re: Qwen3.5 Fine-Tuning Guide
#93[flagged]
This reply is entirely AI generated. You guys are trying to find reason in a hallucination. It's unfortunately impossible to put into words what the "LLM smell" is at this point, but I trust someone else who spends a lot of time reading LLM output can back me up on this. I've seen these agent-written fake anecdotes on Twitter, Reddit, and now here, all with the exact same formatting. They pretend to be real people wi…
Their account only existing 2d lends you a lot of credibility..
That’s wild. And scary.
Re: Qwen3.5 Fine-Tuning Guide
#94Earlier quoted context omitted.
This reply is entirely AI generated. You guys are trying to find reason in a hallucination. It's unfortunately impossible to put into words what the "LLM smell" is at this point, but I trust someone else who spends a lot of time reading LLM output can back me up on this. I've seen these agent-written fake anecdotes on Twitter, Reddit, and now here, all with the exact same formatting. They pretend to be real people wi…
Their account only existing 2d lends you a lot of credibility.. That’s wild. And scary.
What's scary is that it's still the highest upvoted comment on this submission, although it obviously doesn't make sense.
Hope HN has tooling ready to handle this ongoing onslaught of manipulation...
Re: Qwen3.5 Fine-Tuning Guide
#95Earlier quoted context omitted.
But why would I want to results to be done faster but less reliable, vs slower and more reliable? Feels like the sort of thing you'd favor accuracy over speed, otherwise you're just degrading the quality control?
It's not that you want it to be faster, but you want the latency to be predictable and reliable, which is much more the case for local inference than sending it away over a network (and especially to the current set of frontier model providers who don't exactly have standout reliability numbers).
> which is much more the case for local inference than sending it away over a network
Of course, but that isn't what unclear here.
What's unclear is why a 7b LLM model would be better for those things than say a 14b model, as the difference will be minuscule, yet parent somehow made the claim they make more sense for verification because somehow latency is more important than accuracy.
Re: Qwen3.5 Fine-Tuning Guide
#96[flagged]
This reply is entirely AI generated. You guys are trying to find reason in a hallucination. It's unfortunately impossible to put into words what the "LLM smell" is at this point, but I trust someone else who spends a lot of time reading LLM output can back me up on this. I've seen these agent-written fake anecdotes on Twitter, Reddit, and now here, all with the exact same formatting. They pretend to be real people wi…
Other comments from that account feel very similar. Eery.
Re: Qwen3.5 Fine-Tuning Guide
#97[flagged]
This reply is entirely AI generated. You guys are trying to find reason in a hallucination. It's unfortunately impossible to put into words what the "LLM smell" is at this point, but I trust someone else who spends a lot of time reading LLM output can back me up on this. I've seen these agent-written fake anecdotes on Twitter, Reddit, and now here, all with the exact same formatting. They pretend to be real people wi…
The two day old account is an obvious hint but I got to be honest, the content didn't look suspicious on first read. I know you touched on it above, but what do you think triggered your AI generated thought ?
Re: Qwen3.5 Fine-Tuning Guide
#98Earlier quoted context omitted.
Their account only existing 2d lends you a lot of credibility.. That’s wild. And scary.
What's scary is that it's still the highest upvoted comment on this submission, although it obviously doesn't make sense. Hope HN has tooling ready to handle this ongoing onslaught of manipulation...
AI will make humans more AI-like, and milestones will be celebrated when it more perfectly simulates degraded humanity
Re: Qwen3.5 Fine-Tuning Guide
#99Earlier quoted context omitted.
What's scary is that it's still the highest upvoted comment on this submission, although it obviously doesn't make sense. Hope HN has tooling ready to handle this ongoing onslaught of manipulation...
AI will make humans more AI-like, and milestones will be celebrated when it more perfectly simulates degraded humanity
> AI will make humans more AI-like
Already so, LLMs are trained on human-written text, and then spit out text they try to make human-like, so now a bunch of stylistic choices some humans made are "tellsigns of a human using LLMs for writing". It's not just bad, it's removing humanity from the humans.
Re: Qwen3.5 Fine-Tuning Guide
#100[flagged]
This reply is entirely AI generated. You guys are trying to find reason in a hallucination. It's unfortunately impossible to put into words what the "LLM smell" is at this point, but I trust someone else who spends a lot of time reading LLM output can back me up on this. I've seen these agent-written fake anecdotes on Twitter, Reddit, and now here, all with the exact same formatting. They pretend to be real people wi…
[deleted]