Live data from Hacker News

Daily Driving GrapheneOS

blog.matthewbrunelle.com

91–100 of 147 posts

Re: Daily Driving GrapheneOS

#91
post #82

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Of course it is a big place. It is also a big place where credit cards just aren't a thing for most people: https://n26.com/en-eu/blog/taboo-of-credit That article lists some reasons why using a credit card doesn't make sense in most European countries. It's not a way to build up your credit score for one. As a Dutchman, the only way I can lower my credit score is by taking on debts (with the exception of a mortgage)…

> It is also a big place where credit cards just aren't a thing for most people Nonsense. It's hard to find actual statistics on the number of credit cards, but it's obvious that the Netherlands are an outlier, with a paltry 0.02 credit cards per capita, vs Luxemburg's 3.98 (wtf). If I filter out the non-EU countries from the dataset below, I end up with 0.5 credit cards per capita. That's nowhere near "not a thing f…

If 25 people have 4 credit cards each and 75 people have none, then we have 1 card/capita, but only 25% of the population uses credit cards.

The median seems to be 0.25 cards/capita. Your own source already ~agrees that they're "not a thing for most people" (if we're really pedantic we can start looking at populations of those countries), but to find a more realistic estimate for the percentage of the population who use credit cards we would have to divide this figure by the average number of credit cards among people who have at least one.

Re: Daily Driving GrapheneOS

#92
post #69

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Sorry but thats a statement thats just willfully ignorant. Yes people need to have access to their financials when under way. That can range for PushTans, CreditCard Confirmations, to checking their budgets, moving something from one account to another, topping up your Prepaid Card. Or just being able to Pay with a Card on your Phone when you forgot your Wallet. Sure you could say I do not go out and do not need that…

But you can do all those things via a browser.

You can pay with a card on your phone? I mean, sure, if you are buying something online. Not with contactless I think

Re: Daily Driving GrapheneOS

#93
post #92
post #69

Earlier quoted context omitted.

But you can do all those things via a browser.

You can pay with a card on your phone? I mean, sure, if you are buying something online. Not with contactless I think

You can do all things with a browser and a card, yes.

I'm assuming that most people will carry the card with them anyway.

Re: Daily Driving GrapheneOS

#94

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Also, most smartphones (especially GrapheneOS, iOS, Pixel, etc) are far more secure than desktops/laptops. So also from a security perspective it's better to do banking on a phone.

And it’s very hard to actually steal a cellphone since it’s always with you, whereas houses get broken into all the time.

True but you can also argue the opposite since its a lot easier to loose it and more exposed to more people that could be thieves.

Re: Daily Driving GrapheneOS

#95

TBH What I wanted from the world is AOSP distribution. Built similarly to GrapheneOS in terms of distribution, ease of install. But I just don't feel I need all these privacy enhancements and stuff, I'm perfectly fine with ordinary system compiled from Google sources with proper update schedule. Also I don't want to see anything installed out of the box, except maybe single app to install AOSP apps, F-Droid, Play Sto…

You could try https://iode.tech/iodeos/ or https://e.foundation/e-os/ but neither is as minimalist as you'd like.

Re: Daily Driving GrapheneOS

#97
post #37

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Mobile apps are how most people do banking these days, and it shows. In my experience banking apps are a lot more maintained and modern than classic online banking interfaces. So you're not just sacrificing "on the go" banking, you are likely sacrificing use of the best interface your bank offers.

Also, most smartphones (especially GrapheneOS, iOS, Pixel, etc) are far more secure than desktops/laptops. So also from a security perspective it's better to do banking on a phone.

Unless you use Qubes OS (which I do).

Re: Daily Driving GrapheneOS

#98

I’ve tried but: couldn’t get my card to work on wallet. Can’t verify. Uber couldn’t verify payment so I couldn’t take a ride when needed.

I think the second problem is unrelated to the smartphone OS. You can use Uber using only the website, a smartphone is not even needed to use it.

Well I’m a tech person and I’d never think of using the browser. But thanks

Re: Daily Driving GrapheneOS

#99
post #12

I’ve tried but: couldn’t get my card to work on wallet. Can’t verify. Uber couldn’t verify payment so I couldn’t take a ride when needed.

It's googles fault that cards can't work in graphene. Google needs to whitelist graphene basically to work in the wallet app. On that note, given that graphene is focused around security and privacy, perhaps not givng your payment data to google is probably a good thing

Can’t use my phone to pay becomes kind of useless

Re: Daily Driving GrapheneOS

#100
post #75

I am coming to GrapheneOS from iOS, as recounted in https://blog.majid.info/quit-apple/ My experience with seedvault is not as positive as the OP, it fails for about half my apps. I guess I have another year to fix this when the GrapheneOS enabled Motorola flagship comes out. I carry both my iPhone 16 Plus and my Pixel 8 Pro, but limit my iPhone use to mobile banking, Apple Pay and Find My.

Seedvault is godawful and I'm saying it as a someone using GOS as a daily driver. Utterly awful.

Two backup runs can give different results (failing in different places or failing to restore everything), and I haven't heard of the one person it works for every time.

I wish I could just run Titanium Backup :(

Post reply on HN