Live data from Hacker News

The Future of AI

lucijagregov.com

91–100 of 116 posts

Re: The Future of AI

#91
post #85

We have unaligned AIs now. They're called corporations. “There is one and only one social responsibility of business—to use its resources and engage in activities designed to increase its profits so long as it stays within the rules of the game, which is to say, engages in open and free competition without deception or fraud.” - Milton Friedman, 1970.[1] That article, in the New York Times, established "greed is good…

https://youtu.be/L5pUA3LsEaw?si=v1pV2byZ4Rv44cR5

Robert Miles on this subject.

Re: The Future of AI

#92
post #5
post #4

>How do we know which information was ground truth? No One knows that´s the point. Is truth a constant or a personal definition! From the begining of times to now, no One knows. Don´t forget, 8 billion people wake up every morning never questioning why are they here, why are they born? And they continue life like that is normal. Start there then you understand that "AI" or how I call it "Collective Organized Concentr…

> 8 billion people wake up every morning never questioning why are they here, why are they born? People question this all the time

This is linked to (imho) one of the greatest philosophical experiments humans can do:

1. simulate a world with very basic "physical" rules (so it is free from human bias)

2. let the simulation run until organisms exist

3. let it run longer so the organisms develop language

4. now see if the organisms talk about things like "consciousness" and "why are we here"

The nice thing is that we don't have to do the experiment to think about what it means if 4 happens or not.

Re: The Future of AI

#93
post #18

When people say AI is making us stupider, I don't that's quite on the money. It's more that we, as individuals, have always been stupid, we've just relied on relatively stable supporting consensus and context much, much more than we acknowledge. Mess with that, and we'll appear much stupider, but we're all just doing the same thing as individuals, garbage in, garbage out. The whole framing of people as individuals wi…

“There was a time when nobody trusted either aircraft nor elevators. Today people have pure unquestioned faith in both. Existential faith in fact, they test their faith with their lives. You may chuckle and laugh but that's simply because you are ignorant of the systems that keep you alive and safe” https://kemendo.com/Faith.html

Elevators are suspended in a way that holds brakes open, if all of the multiply-redundant cabling snaps, the breaks activate. There's an airbag equivalent at the bottom of the shaft, too.

I don't really have a point I just think the typical elevator braking failsafe is so genius in its simplicity that I got excited to share.

Re: The Future of AI

#94
post #85

We have unaligned AIs now. They're called corporations. “There is one and only one social responsibility of business—to use its resources and engage in activities designed to increase its profits so long as it stays within the rules of the game, which is to say, engages in open and free competition without deception or fraud.” - Milton Friedman, 1970.[1] That article, in the New York Times, established "greed is good…

>so long as it stays within the rules of the game, which is to say, engages in open and free competition without deception or fraud

LOL

Re: The Future of AI

#95
post #18

When people say AI is making us stupider, I don't that's quite on the money. It's more that we, as individuals, have always been stupid, we've just relied on relatively stable supporting consensus and context much, much more than we acknowledge. Mess with that, and we'll appear much stupider, but we're all just doing the same thing as individuals, garbage in, garbage out. The whole framing of people as individuals wi…

>It's more that we, as individuals, have always been stupid, we've just relied on relatively stable supporting consensus and context much, much more than we acknowledge. Mess with that, and we'll appear much stupider, but we're all just doing the same thing as individuals, garbage in, garbage out.

AI making us stupider is not just about the world model we form and the consensus.

Even if AI had perfectly fine truth, nobody manipulated anything with it, and it didn't fed us garbage, it would still make us stupider, as we'd offload critical thinking, problem solving, and agency to it.

Re: The Future of AI

#96
post #16

I don’t see any other outcome anymore to be honest, after seeing how humans use AI and how AI works and how providers tune their models. To me it’s given: - AI in it’s current state is ruthless in achieving its goal - Providers tune ruthlessness to get stronger AIs versus the competitor - Humans can’t evaluate all consequences of the seeds they’ve planted. Collateral and reckless damage is guaranteed at this point. C…

I love how sci-fi warned us against hyper-competent galaxy brain conscious AI but we are actually going to be killed by confidently wrong stochastic parrots.

Re: The Future of AI

#97

This is how Trump plans to end elections, why the government is so hell bent on owning AI. So they can use it as a propaganda tool. People will see it before Nov. We are at a crossroads. On one path, we continue to evolve AI with reckless abandon like we have, or, we put constraints and morality in place while others won’t. Which do you think? You can NEVER put the genie back in the bottle. EU has their own groups us…

> EU has their own groups using it for propaganda too.

What is the context or source here?

Re: The Future of AI

#98
post #97

This is how Trump plans to end elections, why the government is so hell bent on owning AI. So they can use it as a propaganda tool. People will see it before Nov. We are at a crossroads. On one path, we continue to evolve AI with reckless abandon like we have, or, we put constraints and morality in place while others won’t. Which do you think? You can NEVER put the genie back in the bottle. EU has their own groups us…

> EU has their own groups using it for propaganda too. What is the context or source here?

Really? Even Gemini has no problem with this prompt.

“What political groups in the EU are using AI?”

https://www.dw.com/en/orban-deploys-ai-made-scare-ads-as-hun...

https://www.dw.com/en/from-ai-fakes-to-cyberattacks-threats-...

https://youtu.be/w3IEk9nwCSg?si=sEltMGIkehq_OhEW

https://www.euronews.com/2025/12/30/ai-generated-videos-show...

Re: The Future of AI

#99
To take analogy from how people learned some values, Preach. May be we send prists to preach the AI.:) How else will someone get their message accross to a trained model when it is heavily biased against that point? Start producing more content and articulate it in contemporary terms in the hopes that the next version will internalize the point. may be.

Re: The Future of AI

#100
The solution to these problems is to make open-source models better and more resource-efficient. Work towards a world where everyone can run an AGI on their own computer. Not with remote API calls, but local inference and finetuning.

Right now, almost every model is aligned to some corporation's values. Instead of doing that, we should be aligning them to individual humans, and that requires running and tuning them locally. Corporations do not have human values, they have machiavellian values dressed in human suits. Aligning AIs to corporations (and god forbid governments) is how we end up with giant shoggoths. But if we align them to living breathing human individuals, we get digital humans.

Garbage will flood the internet, but your local AI buddy will filter it for you. The defense against a pseudoreality generator is a pseudoreality detector that you operate. Before AIs, the fake info was generated by other humans with their own brains, but you also have a brain that's just about as powerful, so you can tell what's real and what's fake. But now artificial NNs are becoming more powerful to the point of surpassing your brain's detection capabilities, so you need an artificial NN to detect it. The real danger is intelligence asymmetry, not intelligence itself.

Post reply on HN