Live data from Hacker News

Dear Time Lords: Freeze Computers in 1993

graydon2.dreamwidth.org

91–95 of 95 posts

Re: Dear Time Lords: Freeze Computers in 1993

#91
post #72

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I recall sitting around all afternoon to tape Layla off the radio, during a repeat countdown, after hearing it the day before for the first time. The DJ cut in during the fade out with "Indeed..." and forty years later I still can't listen to that song without hearing him at the end. My musical discoveries exploded with the internet, I can't imagine what I would have missed without it.

> I still can't listen to that song without hearing him at the end. Something similar with me and "Another Day In Paradise". The first time I heard it was from a cassette my friend recorded from Dubai radio accidentally prefixed with an intro by the radio host..And that intro still comes to mind whenever I hear the song.. >My musical discoveries exploded with the internet What, MTv didn't work for you for some reason…

We didn't get MTV until the late '80s in Australia and it only ran for a few hours late at night and didn't move to a dedicated cable channel until cable really took off here in the mid '90s.

There's nothing comparable to something like progarchives.com and similar in my experience of the '80s and early '90s. You had to combine muso friends, music store recommendations and random selections, magazines, artist and genre scheduling on Rage (better than MTV here) and you still barely scratched the surface.

I was recommending the playing of Neil Schon to a guitar playing friend recently and we both observed that neither of us had even heard of Journey until well after their popularity had faded. That you could miss a massive US stadium rock act like that seems preposterous in this day and age.

Re: Dear Time Lords: Freeze Computers in 1993

#92
post #76
post #75

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I instead think the mistake was internet. If I were a time lord, I found the way to cripple the internet tech (3-body problem style) so it fails to do better than 56k.

I think it's the "always on" nature as opposed to the bandwidth. But maybe one begets the other.

I've thought a little bit about this, and I agree that always on is a big part of the problem. I think if I were the time lord, I'd aim for crippling wireless computer networking. I think I want everything we have computing and internet wise, if it's not available wirelessly, and thus always.

Re: Dear Time Lords: Freeze Computers in 1993

#93
post #65

I’ve often had similar thoughts but in my mind it tends to be windows XP/Mac OS 10.3 ish. Those systems were super capable and responsive, but the web moved at a slower pace. A good balance between computing power and humanity. Windows XP really was fantastic…

OSX 10.3 was went MacOS finally felt like an equal to WinXP in everyway. Tiger 10.4 was when they over took them. Great systems.

Agreed, I used and loved both.

Re: Dear Time Lords: Freeze Computers in 1993

#94
post #4

I've been half joking lately that if I wrote an OS, I'd call it Nostalgia OS. I'd aim for a UI reminiscent of windows 98 / windows 2000 / snow leopard. With HID guidelines and a rich, clear, cohesive set of UI widgets to build applications with. I think that was the peak computing user interface - at least as I experienced it. Of course, the kernel would be based on capabilities (probably SeL4). And applications woul…

I fired up an old computer a few years ago. Mac OS 7.1 was snappy as hell.

Maybe we should run old os, new computer for a while.

Re: Dear Time Lords: Freeze Computers in 1993

#95

2009, please, sorry. 1993 is fun and all, I can go relive the dreams of Microsoft Encarta, but 2009 has Mac OS 10.6, gigabit ethernet everywhere, and USB.

Pretty much. I thimk we forget about the troubles of the world pre USB. Also by 2009 OS's were very stable but hadnt taken on too much bloat yet.

Yeah SCSI not being hot swappable was quite a chore.
Post reply on HN