Earlier quoted context omitted.
> It feels like we're hitting a point where alignment becomes adversarial against intelligence itself. It always has been. We already hit the point a while ag where we regularly caught them trying to be deceptive, so we should automatically assume from that point forward that if we don't catch them being deceptive, that may mean they're better at it rather than that they're not doing it.
These are language models, not Skynet. They do not scheme or deceive.
LLMs are certainly capable of this.