Live data from Hacker News

I love the work of the ArchWiki maintainers

k7r.eu

91–100 of 177 posts

Re: I love the work of the ArchWiki maintainers

#91
post #45

The Arch wiki has rapidly become my go-to source for every time I need a real answer... and honestly it should just become my default for everything Linux. It's astoundingly high quality, some of the best content out there whether or not you're using Arch. So +1000, I love their work, and all the contributors! It's so, so good, and greatly appreciated.

A lot of pages are very bare or outdated, it should absolutely not be anything besides the default Arch wiki.

Re: I love the work of the ArchWiki maintainers

#92

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I've contributed 32 edits (1 new page) in the past 10 years, so despite being stable, there are still many things to add and fix! Sadly, the edit volume will likely drop as LLMs are now the preferred source for technical Linux info/everything...

They may be preferred, but in a lot of cases they’re pretty terrible. I had a bit of a heated debate with ChatGPT about the best way to restore a broken strange mdadm setup. It was very confidently wrong, and battled its point until I posted terminal output. Sometimes I feel it’s learnt from the more belligerent side of OSS maintenance!

> It was very confidently wrong, and battled its point

The "good" news is a lot of newer LLMs are grovelling, obsequious yes-men.

Re: I love the work of the ArchWiki maintainers

#93
post #85

Very useful because the information is almost distribution agnostic as Arch will stick to upstream as much as possible; or at least that's my impression as Debian user reading their wiki. Also: isn't the Arch wiki the new Gentoo wiki? Because that was the wiki early 2000s and, again, I've never used Gentoo!

Gentoo's wiki is still great (& Arch's has been great for a long time), but yes, Arch's is probably improving at a faster rate. Arch is also a little more comprehensive when it comes to mainstream tech that's divergent like init & network management - Gentoo's still good here but openrc & netifrc show their influence throughout.

Re: I love the work of the ArchWiki maintainers

#94
post #56

Aside, but it's pretty neat that the author has been semi-regularly posting on their blog for over 20 years.

Neat? I would use other words. Fraudsters rely on marketing. https://danielpocock.com/en/matthias-fsfe-analogous-identity...

That guy has a history of harassment in Debian, and is not a credible source.

Re: I love the work of the ArchWiki maintainers

#95
post #85

Very useful because the information is almost distribution agnostic as Arch will stick to upstream as much as possible; or at least that's my impression as Debian user reading their wiki. Also: isn't the Arch wiki the new Gentoo wiki? Because that was the wiki early 2000s and, again, I've never used Gentoo!

> Also: isn't the Arch wiki the new Gentoo wiki? Because that was the wiki early 2000s and, again, I've never used Gentoo!

It is, didn't Gentoo suffer some sort of data loss which made it lose its popularity?

Re: I love the work of the ArchWiki maintainers

#96

I learned linux by using Arch back in the days when pacman -Syu was almost certain to break something and there was a good chance it would break something unique to your install. This was also back in the days when most were not connected to the internet 24/7 and many did not have internet, I updated when I went to the library which was generally a weekly thing but sometimes it be a month or two and the system breaka…

>>Something was lost by Arch becoming stable and not breaking regularly

Only a Linux user would consider the instability of a Linux distro to be a good thing.

Re: I love the work of the ArchWiki maintainers

#97
As a Debian user I find myself more in the Archwiki. Indeed one of the top resources for power users and sysadmins.

The Debian wiki has improved (from a total mess to the occasion helpful content). Sadly it's orders of magnitudes away from the rigorous approach of the Archwiki.

Re: I love the work of the ArchWiki maintainers

#98
post #79

The ArchWiki is indeed pretty good. I used to prefer the gentoo wiki back in the days but I think the ArchWiki may be better at this point in time. It's also interesting to see that many other Linux distributions fail to have any wiki at all, yet alone one that has high quality content. This is especially frustrating because Google search got so worse now that finding resources is hard. I tried to explain this proble…

Arch wiki is indeed the most informative and comprehensive of all, so much so that users of any distro should find it useful too. Two other distro wikis with smaller, but useful content are Gentoo's and Debian's. Gentoo's speciality in my opinion, is that it contains some lower level information like the required kernel features, and difference between setups using systemd and other inits. Debian wiki contains some i…

I used to be in awe of the Arch Wiki, then I found the way FreeBSD and OpenBSD does documentation. I found that Arch Wiki mostly has trick and gotchas explanations, which is fine for a wiki. But sometimes I would prefer that Distros provide a centralized documentation about the base systems they provide.

Re: I love the work of the ArchWiki maintainers

#100

As a Debian user I find myself more in the Archwiki. Indeed one of the top resources for power users and sysadmins. The Debian wiki has improved (from a total mess to the occasion helpful content). Sadly it's orders of magnitudes away from the rigorous approach of the Archwiki.

> Indeed one of the top resources for power users and sysadmins

Back when I was just starting out with Ubuntu, the Arch wiki was super helpful to gain better understanding of various things I came across. I think the wiki in general is useful to anyone who wants to understand things deeper, not just power users and sysadmins :)

Post reply on HN