Earlier quoted context omitted.
They didn't say "think differently", they said "promoting fascism". If you look at J6 attempted self-coup where people were chanting death threats agaisnt the vice president and had a hangman's noose ready and pipe bombs were found and say "that was a peaceful protest", while also looking at the woman who was shot dead through the side window of her car while departing from a group of ICE officers and call that "self…
The problem is that after years of people crying "facism" for mean tweets, lowering coprorate taxes and eforcing a national border, the term has lost any meaning. Maybe we need a new term?
Statement by Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Netherlands, Norway, Sweden, UK
91–95 of 95 posts
Re: Statement by Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Netherlands, Norway, Sweden, UK
#92I’ll put myself in the minority here by saying that I think Trump is probably right. Greenland can’t be credibly defended by Denmark, the EU or even NATO. Article 5 is an untested foundation myth. Greenland is far away. Political will matters. We might be heading towards an independent Greenland if we continue following the status quo, which would be influenced strongly by adversaries and would be a US security night…
See:
>NATO invoked Article 5 in response to Al Qaeda's terrorist attacks against the United States on 11 September 2001
https://www.nato.int/en/what-we-do/introduction-to-nato/coll...
Now take a look at the European countries who helped the US:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_in_Afghanistan_(2001%E2%80...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraq_War
Then scroll down to "Dead". Those Europeans died for the United States.
Re: Statement by Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Netherlands, Norway, Sweden, UK
#93Earlier quoted context omitted.
If trump is actually deranged enough to use military force against Greenland we'll see how capable the EU is of defending it - and I suspect they'll put on a good show. What the EU wouldn't be able to handle, I suspect, is would be a full ground invasion by China, not that China would/needs to do that. If the US was genuinely concerned about the security of Greenland they should have discussed this with the EU and en…
> If the US was genuinely concerned about the security of Greenland they should have discussed this with the EU and encouraged them to reinforce the island, and/or offered a joint base. This is where it gets stupid... well, stupider. The US already has a base on Greenland, namely the Pituffik Space Base / Thule Air Base [1]. The US used to have a larger military presence in Greenland, including other bases, but choos…
The EU response to the rhetoric from Trump is to send 30 men and put out a press release telling everyone how harmless they are. The action “Poses no threat to anyone”. Their military show of force, poses no threat to anyone.
This is who you’re dealing with.
Re: Statement by Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Netherlands, Norway, Sweden, UK
#94Earlier quoted context omitted.
Don't let the people in your life casually get away with promoting fascism. Punish them socially.
That strategy may be cathartic, but it will have the opposite of the desired effect. If there's any hope of changing someone's mind, it has to start by respecting their opinion no matter how wrong you think it is. If you start a fight you'll get a fight.
Re: Statement by Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Netherlands, Norway, Sweden, UK
#95Earlier quoted context omitted.
Don't let the people in your life casually get away with promoting fascism. Punish them socially.
That strategy may be cathartic, but it will have the opposite of the desired effect. If there's any hope of changing someone's mind, it has to start by respecting their opinion no matter how wrong you think it is. If you start a fight you'll get a fight.