Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Google releases its new Google Sans Flex font as open source

omgubuntu.co.uk

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

91–100 of 112 posts

Re: Google releases its new Google Sans Flex font as open source

#91

Post by mjmas »

adrian_b wrote: post #66
Hupriene wrote: post #61

Earlier quoted context omitted.

To be fair the designer who created the font would probably agree that for use cases like passwords or serial numbers etc. you should use a different font. That's the nice thing about having different fonts around. You can choose which one you want to use.

That is a solution applicable for a document or GUI created by yourself, where you can define various styles with associated fonts and use them appropriately. However, I see the worst offenders on various Web pages (frequently for various URLs) where I do not control the typeface, unless I instruct the browser to ignore the style sheet of the rendered Web page and use my own fonts instead, which can be tedious or cre…

I have a few CSS overrides for some websites to turn all input boxes into monospace fonts. It is far easier to use them then.

Re: Google releases its new Google Sans Flex font as open source

#92

Post by EdwardDiego »

aucisson_masque wrote: post #64

Does it matter ? No really, I'm not trying to be edgy. Does the font we're using to read a document matters?? Last time I checked, scientist agreed that the best for an average user is the font you're used to. Serif, sans serif,.. didn't matter. Just keep using the one you always used. So I don't get why every so often, Google work on a new font. Pick one and stick to it, user don't care. Or am I missing something ?…

According to Secretary of State, fonts can be woke now, so I guess?

Re: Google releases its new Google Sans Flex font as open source

#93

Post by EdwardDiego »

jrpelkonen wrote: post #20
copperx wrote: post #11

Great, but is it free of DEI? can it be used in official documents?

The round variant looks like a fatty lacking warrior ethos. Unsuitable for Department of War. /s

From now on, we're running the Army like a frat party. No fat chicks! No fuggos! And if you're a fat dude, you better be damn funny!

-- Secretary of War ~~Pete Hegseth~~ Colin Jost.

Re: Google releases its new Google Sans Flex font as open source

#95

Post by avree »

EdwardDiego wrote: post #92
aucisson_masque wrote: post #64

Does it matter ? No really, I'm not trying to be edgy. Does the font we're using to read a document matters?? Last time I checked, scientist agreed that the best for an average user is the font you're used to. Serif, sans serif,.. didn't matter. Just keep using the one you always used. So I don't get why every so often, Google work on a new font. Pick one and stick to it, user don't care. Or am I missing something ?…

According to Secretary of State, fonts can be woke now, so I guess?

Don't think he ever described it as "woke". https://daringfireball.net/2025/12/full_text_of_marco_rubio_...

Re: Google releases its new Google Sans Flex font as open source

#96

Post by dogmatism »

chiefalchemist wrote: post #59
lucb1e wrote: post #9

Where possible, I've stopped picking fonts that don't distinguish lowercase l and uppercase I. Words virtually always have redundancy (or context in the sentence) and it's fine in 98% of cases, but too often someone sends a token, password, name, or other string where you need to copy it out to another application to see it and just... why? Why bother? I/O test for Sans Flex: https://snipboard.io/wXCQq5.jpg It passes…

Lately I’ve become a fan of: https://fonts.google.com/specimen/Atkinson+Hyperlegible Mainly for its attention to detail. It’s careful to make it obvious when it matters. For example, O and 0, lower case L and 1, and others.

I mean, how can you not like it?

It's hyperlegible!

Re: Google releases its new Google Sans Flex font as open source

#97

Post by ziml77 »

torbengee wrote: post #28

I've tried so many fonts in my coding life, but I think I've finally found my forever font: JetBrains Mono. Crisp, all characters distinguishable, slightly larger lowercase for better reading ... I recently compared it once more to others – https://www.programmingfonts.org/ makes it easy to narrow down to your favourites one by one ... JetBrains Mono still wins. :)

Funny, that's my one of my least favorite monospace fonts. My favorite is PragmataPro. I love how the characters are compact yet very readable.

Re: Google releases its new Google Sans Flex font as open source

#98

Post by Brajeshwar »

lucb1e wrote: post #9

Where possible, I've stopped picking fonts that don't distinguish lowercase l and uppercase I. Words virtually always have redundancy (or context in the sentence) and it's fine in 98% of cases, but too often someone sends a token, password, name, or other string where you need to copy it out to another application to see it and just... why? Why bother? I/O test for Sans Flex: https://snipboard.io/wXCQq5.jpg It passes…

This is an Interface font, most suited for User Interfaces (Websites, Apps, etc). Almost all fonts that I have seen that distinguish the “O0 & Il” properly do not look good when used as an Interface font, but look good as an editor or something you do with it (Notes).

For instance, I set Inter[1] as my UI font in Obsidian, but I have set “Atkinson Hyperlegible Next”[2] as my Editor Font. I would gladly use such clean sans-serif fonts (Inter, Flex Sans, Geist, etc.)[3] because they are easy for the human eye to read quickly, even if there is a spelling error, and hence the distinction between the “O0 & Il” would not matter.

So, It Depends on the use case. “Atkinson Hyperlegible Next” is a fantastic, highly readable/recognizable font, but it will look pretty ugly when using it to design interfaces.

1. https://rsms.me/inter/

2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atkinson_Hyperlegible

3. https://vercel.com/font

Re: Google releases its new Google Sans Flex font as open source

#99

Post by 8cvor6j844qw_d6 »

lucb1e wrote: post #9

Where possible, I've stopped picking fonts that don't distinguish lowercase l and uppercase I. Words virtually always have redundancy (or context in the sentence) and it's fine in 98% of cases, but too often someone sends a token, password, name, or other string where you need to copy it out to another application to see it and just... why? Why bother? I/O test for Sans Flex: https://snipboard.io/wXCQq5.jpg It passes…

> stopped picking fonts that don't distinguish lowercase l and uppercase I

Strongly agree on this, Bitwarden previously used a font that made passwords that contains i (or was it I?) and l difficult to distinguish.

It seems they changed the fonts since the recent UI refresh.

Post reply on HN