Live data from Hacker News

A Cozy Mk IV light aircraft crashed after 3D-printed part was weakened by heat

bbc.com

91–100 of 223 posts

Re: A Cozy Mk IV light aircraft crashed after 3D-printed part was weakened by heat

#91

This is the mechanical equivalent of vibe coding. 3D printing itself isn't exactly to blame but the negligence of the company that created and sold this part and omitted it's use from an inspection. Just because a part has the shape of an engineered part does not make it compatible, strong, safe, and fit for purpose. This part could have likely been fine if it used a different material such as Ultem.

Vibe coding can make code that is suitable for production. 3d printed plastic can not be a substitute for a fiberglass-metal part.

Re: A Cozy Mk IV light aircraft crashed after 3D-printed part was weakened by heat

#92

This is the mechanical equivalent of vibe coding. 3D printing itself isn't exactly to blame but the negligence of the company that created and sold this part and omitted it's use from an inspection. Just because a part has the shape of an engineered part does not make it compatible, strong, safe, and fit for purpose. This part could have likely been fine if it used a different material such as Ultem.

I think a more useful definition of vibe coding is "something you can do when it really doesn't matter". Which requires a hell of a lot of judgement to know when it doesn't.

Installing life-critical parts of shoddy engineering into a vital system of your airplane is a good example of when things do matter.

Re: A Cozy Mk IV light aircraft crashed after 3D-printed part was weakened by heat

#93
post #57

This is the mechanical equivalent of vibe coding. 3D printing itself isn't exactly to blame but the negligence of the company that created and sold this part and omitted it's use from an inspection. Just because a part has the shape of an engineered part does not make it compatible, strong, safe, and fit for purpose. This part could have likely been fine if it used a different material such as Ultem.

In what way is this like vibe-coding -- or do you just mean both are bad? According to the report: > The aircraft owner who installed the modified fuel system stated that the 3D-printed induction elbow was purchased in the USA at an airshow, and he understood from the vendor that it was printed from CF-ABS (carbon fibre – acrylonitrile butadiene styrene) filament material, with a glass transition temperature3 of 105°…

Experimental Aircraft are less licensed than non-experimental, so this is more of a YOLO pilot.

Re: A Cozy Mk IV light aircraft crashed after 3D-printed part was weakened by heat

#95
post #83

I hope 3-D printing becomes obsolete when robots can achieve the same efficiency with using the standard construction materials. That should take away all benefits of 3-D printing over regular builds.

3D printing isn’t entirely about automation, it’s also a way to get shapes that are impossible to manufacture traditionally. Modern rocket engines almost all use 3D printing because the shapes are so highly optimized.

Re: A Cozy Mk IV light aircraft crashed after 3D-printed part was weakened by heat

#97
post #2

I wonder what material it was printed with. edit: It was ABS-CF, which shouldn't be used under stress long-term in higher temperatures than maybe 65-70°C, or lower depending on the blend.

Lower, according to the report "Two samples from the air induction elbow were subjected to testing, using a heat-flux differential scanning calorimeter, to determine their glass transition temperature. The measured glass transition temperature for the first sample was 52.8°C, and 54.0°C for the second sample" Yeah, they might have used ABS-CF filament, but unless they got it from a good brand that uses good resin and…

by the glass transition temperature, i'm willing to bet it was printed with pla (probably pla-cf).

Re: A Cozy Mk IV light aircraft crashed after 3D-printed part was weakened by heat

#98

Taken at face value, this is engineering negligence. I've done industrial design with plastics and 3D printed parts. Regardless of the forming techniques, with plastics you still need to consider properties like minimum melting temperatures, tensile stress, and so forth. Then you must test that rigorously. This is all standard procedure. That information is in the data sheet for the material. I did a quick search and…

Also, strictly as a combo 3D-printing and engine enthusiast: Never with a GUN to my head would I install 3D printed parts in a CAR engine, let alone in an aircraft engine. This is spectacularly poor judgement on the part of the owner.

I wouldn’t be that absolute, but not until Boeing and Airbus use them in their aircraft on a regular basis.

Re: A Cozy Mk IV light aircraft crashed after 3D-printed part was weakened by heat

#99
post #82

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think by vibe coding he means taking these things at face value instead of rigorously looking if they are up to the standard. When coding you would rigorously look if the code is good / produces any bugs. With vibe coding, you give a prompt and just accept the output, which might be full of errors and blow up (or melt). The analogy is that, yes you can print airplane parts, but they were sloppy and just accepted th…

>I think by vibe coding he means taking these things at face value instead of rigorously looking if they are up to the standard. Yeah, exactly -- which is why it's a stupid phrase for what happened here. Not every negligence is somehow equatable to an AI pitfall, it's just on parents' mind so it's the only metaphor that gets applied. A poorly fit hammer in a world of nails. I say this as an engineer/proprietor with y…

I think the idea was that 3D printing made doing a thing accessible, previously required solid fundamental knowledge (and very expensive kit). Now you can just take some specs off the internet and press go.

The comparison does not seem as absurd to me as it does to you. vOv

Re: A Cozy Mk IV light aircraft crashed after 3D-printed part was weakened by heat

#100
Not to be a 3d print snob but....

Aside from the failure it looks like it wasn't the best print to start with. Lots of rashing from support and curling at the edges. You can see on the flats where the support was and the outer curve of the elbow looks like it likely wasn't airtight. Appears to me to be printed with the inlet facing upwards.

Better support planning, settings and possibly orientation may have helped.

Other commenters are saying it was likely PLA-CF, which I totally agree with based on the testing, but I can't help but think there is no possible way the person printing this item did not know that. I doubt the print would have come off as good as it did when using ABS-CF settings on PLA-CF.

Big chain of poor choices.

Post reply on HN