Live data from Hacker News

Fara-7B: An efficient agentic model for computer use

91–92 of 92 posts

Re: Fara-7B: An efficient agentic model for computer use

#91

Post by amypetrik8 » Fri, Nov 28, 2025, 4:40 PM UTC

MyFirstSass wrote: post #67

leobg wrote: post #60

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How would you know? What world knowledge do you have access to that they do not?

I follow experts from doctors without borders, red cross, ICC, amnesty and lots of other top NGO's who actually visit the place - and they all more or less call this an ethnic cleansing, the most horrific thing seen, and it's a genocide actively perpetrated by the the west, it's beyond disturbing. There's talks of upwards of 500 thousand deaths now, half a million, most of them civilians, women and children. It's not…

[flagged]

Re: Fara-7B: An efficient agentic model for computer use

#92

Post by freehorse » Fri, Nov 28, 2025, 10:25 PM UTC

subscribed wrote: post #90

freehorse wrote: post #41

Earlier quoted context omitted.

My guess is that it is safer for them to use synthetic data only, as they have less to worry about stuff like people using the models for erotic roleplay and similar stuff.

Why "worry"? Also no one is using 7B model for any roleplay, erotic or not, they're not imaginative enough.

I mean if the model is intended to be deployed somewhere for some purpose by some business, as a business you probably would not want to worry whether users may use to produce sth that could be seen as embarrassing or problematic pr-wise. Having a sanitized and more directed training set can help with that. MS does not produce only 7B models, and 7B models can still say "embarrassing" things. I may be wrong of course.

Post reply on HN