Earlier quoted context omitted.
> to take up arms against our citizens Why are you changing your words? > against their own citizenry Germany, 1930s. Cambodia, 1970s. > You mention Kent State, but that actually illustrates to my point. It flatly doesn't. US armed forces fired on citizens. No US military stopped them. The second amendment didn't stop them, or cause them to hesitate. The idea that the second amendment will change anything about the U…
> Why are you changing your words? I didn’t, do you find these two phrases functionally different? “military person ( if so ordered ) would gladly take up arms against their own citizenry” and “ ordered military has been asked to take up arms against our citizens” They look pretty much the same to me. > Germany, 1930s. Cambodia, 1970s. So are you attempting to equate genocidal regimes that operated over years where m…
Come on. This is just rank dishonesty. Nothing else you said is worth a response.