Earlier quoted context omitted.
@markdotto, thank you for your response @chiefinstigator's comments. Great to hear your perspective. I don't think you needed to be on the defensive as much as you are. All one needs to do is look at the Bootstrap Github page: all your code, its documentation, issue tracking, the sheer number of commits, etc. to know that you and Jacob worked your absolute fucking assess off with/for an absolute fucking shit ton of d…
Thanks man, appreciate that, and I hear you. I tried to maintain my cool and approach it as diplomatic and honestly as I could. This has been brewing for awhile and we have never responded, so I wanted to give as much context as possible. There is still much that could be said, but we'll save that for another time. I truly think all of us are just interested in making stuff on the Internet, and that's all I really ca…
Bootstrap Maintainers Leave Twitter
91–92 of 92 posts
Re: Bootstrap Maintainers Leave Twitter
#92Earlier quoted context omitted.
Wow, I had no clue, but assumed Foundation sprung from BS. I like that Foundation is lighter and easier to override than BS, and even though it has a similar look, it's decidedly different than the stock, ubiquitous bootstrap design. But lack of IE8 support makes it a bit of a hard sell. I'm excited to see what's in store for both frameworks, but hope to see Foundation continue as a leaner, less opinionated alternati…
I really like Foundation based on the same points you raised. It does support IE8, minus the responsive stuff, it's http://foundation.zurb.com/docs/support.php ), and that's a deal breaker for me and why I've never used it since most of the sites I build still get around 10-12% from IE7. You could use the older version of Foundation, but that doesn't appeal to me either.
You can use foundation 3.1 with the htc boxing fix [1] that fixes the grid problems with IE7.
I love use foundation over BS, since BS (to me atleast) is more of a UI decision, where you build your site from scratch with foundation).