Live data from Hacker News

My favorite cult sci-fi and fantasy books you may not have heard of before

shepherd.com

91–100 of 179 posts

Re: My favorite cult sci-fi and fantasy books you may not have heard of before

#91

I've read 3 out of those 5 books, and I see our preferences differ. For instance, I've a few books from Van Vogt, and I can't imagine I could like anything he wrote. - "A voyage to Arcturus" tried hard at being strange and philosophical, but it seemed shallow and I did not feel interested. - "The worm Ouroboros" was better, with a very unusual epic style, both in writing style and in the story. But some points made m…

"The Dying Earth" is an "important" book historically as it is the source inspiration for the early Dungeons and Dragons magic system (some of the spells are clearly copied from it).

As an aside, I've had the good fortune to play in a few "Dying Earth" roleplaying campaigns (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Dying_Earth_Roleplaying_Ga...) and it's one of the most fun RPGs as most of the gameplay revolves around one-upping everyone else and experience is awarded for using taglines appropriately rather than killing monsters etc.

Re: My favorite cult sci-fi and fantasy books you may not have heard of before

#92

I read sci-fi but not fantasy, why do people insist on lumping these together?

How would you classify The Foundation? Classic sci-fi novel, right? But it has telepaths.. By modern standards, telepathy, empaths, telekinesis.. that's all magic. Fantasy. But in 20th century science fiction it was extremely common.

I don't see the problem. You yourself seem to have no trouble at all identifying The Foundation as sci-fi.

Re: My favorite cult sci-fi and fantasy books you may not have heard of before

#93

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How would you classify The Foundation? Classic sci-fi novel, right? But it has telepaths.. By modern standards, telepathy, empaths, telekinesis.. that's all magic. Fantasy. But in 20th century science fiction it was extremely common.

I don't see the problem. You yourself seem to have no trouble at all identifying The Foundation as sci-fi.

There's no clear cut line. Wizards in one, starships in the other, but there's lots of magic in sci fi and lots of space in fantasy. The two genres meld together into a continuum and so it's only fair when some people classify them together. Discrete classification of continuous phenomena will always be a bit subjective.

Re: My favorite cult sci-fi and fantasy books you may not have heard of before

#94
post #2

Anyone got some favs to share? I need to read the new Peter Hamilton book (book 2 due out soon). And I am ashamed to admit I haven't read any Greg Egan yet, need to get on that :)

River of Gods by Ian McDonald

Indian politics 100 years following independence, forbidden AIs that pass a predefined threshold and policemen that chase them, individuals who have all their gender indicators surgically removed ...

An amazingly saturated piece of writing

Re: My favorite cult sci-fi and fantasy books you may not have heard of before

#95
post #88

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If the criterion is that it's to some extent imaginary, we already have a word for that: Fiction.

That's inaccurate. SF/Fantasy contains elements which are not possible under the laws of physics, not anything imaginary. Literary fiction is also imaginary, but taking place in "our world". (The lines get blurrier when talking about imagined historical fiction, or even things like alternative fiction.)

Strictly speaking you don't have to have elements not possible under the laws of physics. I would definitely call The Martian science fiction, but it doesn't really try to break any physical laws.

Even things like Tau Zero are using relativistic time dilation as the plot driver.

Re: My favorite cult sci-fi and fantasy books you may not have heard of before

#96
post #88

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That's inaccurate. SF/Fantasy contains elements which are not possible under the laws of physics, not anything imaginary. Literary fiction is also imaginary, but taking place in "our world". (The lines get blurrier when talking about imagined historical fiction, or even things like alternative fiction.)

Strictly speaking you don't have to have elements not possible under the laws of physics. I would definitely call The Martian science fiction, but it doesn't really try to break any physical laws. Even things like Tau Zero are using relativistic time dilation as the plot driver.

(Haven't read Tau Zero.)

I agree, and sometimes the line is drawn between SF being "things that are theoretically possible" vs. Fantasy where things are impossible. But then you have things like Egan's Clockwork Trilogy, which is "what if the laws of physics actually worked a bit differently in this specific way" but which I assume anyone would consider SF. As opposed to Brandon Sanderson's books, which could be described in a similar way, but are usually categorized Fantasy.

At the end, it's mostly a marketing and feeling thing. As one of my favorite authors put it, the different between SF and Fantasy sometimes comes down to - are you putting a tree or a spaceship on the cover of your book?

Re: My favorite cult sci-fi and fantasy books you may not have heard of before

#97
post #64

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I love Stanislaw Lem. Solaris is his most famous and it has many of his core themes; I'd also try Fiasco. I'm also a huge fan of R.A. Lafferty, but his stuff his harder to find, mostly out of print. Peter Watts' Blindsight is amazing recent-ish hard SF. (the follow-up, I did not like at all). Anything from the Strugatsky brothers you can get your hands on!

I also love Solaris. I remember reading it the first time as a teenager. It is so matter-of-fact in its telling, but the facts are so bizarre, that I found it to really induce terror. It has always struck me as more of a horror novel than as a sci-fi novel although it is clearly the latter. There are now multiple English translations of Solaris available. I know that there’s been a lot of praise for the newer transla…

I grew up in Germany, and there are more German translations of Lem than there are English translations - some 'first' English translations are very recent (last 10 years? Like Summae Technologicae?). I've always had a hypothesis that German geeks are more constrained and worried about the impacts of tech because we grew up with Lem, while American geeks grew up with Heinlein. VERY different views of the world.

Re: My favorite cult sci-fi and fantasy books you may not have heard of before

#98

I read sci-fi but not fantasy, why do people insist on lumping these together?

> I read sci-fi but not fantasy

I used to be the same. Ask yourself why.

Harumi Marukami and Han Kang count as fantasy. (I’d argue so does Ian Banks.) Read Tolkien with a hard eye towards rules, meanwhile, and you find a universe that is largely consistent in the Unseen over the Seen, which pretty neatly maps to invisible physics guiding visible phenomena.

Re: My favorite cult sci-fi and fantasy books you may not have heard of before

#99
post #2

Anyone got some favs to share? I need to read the new Peter Hamilton book (book 2 due out soon). And I am ashamed to admit I haven't read any Greg Egan yet, need to get on that :)

I usually care more about the ideas than characters / prose and the recs below kinda reflect that.

Anyways, in no particular order ...

  - Adiamante by Modesitt (1996), pacifist environmentalists vs cyberpunk warmongers. It's a lot of philosophy and a bit preachy at that but the world building was pretty thorough.
  - Last and First Idol by Gengen Kusano (2018). Similar to Last and First Men by Olaf Stapledon, it parodies various aspects of Japanese culture over a period of eons. (It's a set of three ~70pg stories).
  - Harry Potter and the Methods of Rationality by Eliezer Yudkowsky (2010). Parody where the main character investigates how to exploit magic. Kind of like xkcd / what-if but in the Harry Potter universe. Author is controversial and the story's pompous /r/iamverysmart vibes can be offputting but I enjoyed it.
Also want to second some of the other recs in this thread.

  - Greg Egan's stuff
  - There is No Antimimetics Division by qntm
  - Sequels to Enders Game and the Ender's Shadow spinoffs by Orson Scott Card.
  - Dragon's Egg and its sequel by Robert L. Forward.

Re: My favorite cult sci-fi and fantasy books you may not have heard of before

#100

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They really aren't all that different from each other. One is imaginary things that might one day be possible, and the other is imaginary things that won't ever be possible. And even then, that can swap between the genres. Scifi often contains FTL tech, which from what we know is almost certainly impossible so it's actually more like fantastical magic. Meanwhile, fantasy can have hard rules for its magic, in which ca…

It's not on the quality level of these books, but the Off to Be the Wizard series of books are humorous programming-as-magic tales that skirt the sci-fi/fantasy line. [The fulcrum of the story is that there is a computer file "out there" that reflects reality; those who find it can edit it to do all kinds of "magic". Hilarity ensues.]

Been a while since I read those! I love the description of how they try to figure out program the file to allow them to "fly / hover in place".
Post reply on HN