Earlier quoted context omitted.
You can still "win" by taking money from the other human players and minimizing EV loss against bots. The major poker sites claim that they have really good (and very top secret) bot detection. I'm skeptical.
I used to work for an online poker outfit. The boss wanted weak bots populating the tables so that we looked popular. Of course, he had a “crack team” of bot writers for playing on “other sites” to make money, too.
I played 1k hands of online poker and built a web app with Cursor AI
91–100 of 167 posts
Re: I played 1k hands of online poker and built a web app with Cursor AI
#92Earlier quoted context omitted.
Surprisingly, no. Most sites do a good job of finding and banning bots. It's also fairly easy to spot a bot. They will make odd sized bets at times. You check to see if that betting line is taken in a solver.
Sites have very a strong incentive to make you believe this. Otherwise no human would join anymore.
Even some people who are victims of scams admit that at the time they sent some/all of money they knew it was a scam but did it anyway.
Re: I played 1k hands of online poker and built a web app with Cursor AI
#93Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yeah. Poker isn’t actually hard to play perfectly if you’re writing a bot. The hard part is making it look authentic and not emit any patterns or other signals that could be detected in the data.
> Poker isn’t actually hard to play perfectly if you’re writing a bot Writing a winning poker bot is not trivial, you are unknowingly spreading false information.
Re: I played 1k hands of online poker and built a web app with Cursor AI
#94Earlier quoted context omitted.
You can still "win" by taking money from the other human players and minimizing EV loss against bots. The major poker sites claim that they have really good (and very top secret) bot detection. I'm skeptical.
I used to work for an online poker outfit. The boss wanted weak bots populating the tables so that we looked popular. Of course, he had a “crack team” of bot writers for playing on “other sites” to make money, too.
Re: I played 1k hands of online poker and built a web app with Cursor AI
#95Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm a software engineer with 10+ years of experience. I'm also a poker player that has a very deep understanding of the game. Writing a poker bot that can beat the game is absolutely not trivial. There are "solvers" that use counterfactual regret minimization to solve a constrained version of the game for specific scenarios. These are useful for understanding the principles of the game but they are not the cheat shee…
I'm an ex online poker pro. You probably don't have the deep understanding of the game you think you have. Bots were already destroying the field up to mid-stakes 10 years ago.
Re: I played 1k hands of online poker and built a web app with Cursor AI
#96Earlier quoted context omitted.
Collusion in live poker, especially at low to mid-stakes, is almost non-existent.
I see it all the time at low stakes cash games. This is how people earn a living
Re: I played 1k hands of online poker and built a web app with Cursor AI
#97Re: I played 1k hands of online poker and built a web app with Cursor AI
#98If you're looking for a tool that may be a bit better than Cursor for UX, you could potentially look into Lovable. If you know what you want and the proper design terminology, you can potentially make some slick looking UIs.
Thanks! Can I use Lovable to design and then bring that back and have Cursor implement it?
Re: I played 1k hands of online poker and built a web app with Cursor AI
#99Earlier quoted context omitted.
Sites have very a strong incentive to make you believe this. Otherwise no human would join anymore.
That’s not true, people willingly put money into games that they know are heavily slanted against them all the time. Even some people who are victims of scams admit that at the time they sent some/all of money they knew it was a scam but did it anyway.
Re: I played 1k hands of online poker and built a web app with Cursor AI
#100Earlier quoted context omitted.
You can still "win" by taking money from the other human players and minimizing EV loss against bots. The major poker sites claim that they have really good (and very top secret) bot detection. I'm skeptical.
Why wouldn’t you put the bots together at the same table if you could detect them?