91–100 of 239 posts
Remind me to stick to my hyperlocal fast food restaurant that only has one location and probably doesn't record every conversation you have with them or use any of the other gross surveillance technology that was recorded here. The story is really about two things. Their poor information security is pathetic, but their actual surveillance tech is genuinely kind of politically concerning. Even if it is technically leg…
And.. its down “Blog post not found” archive link here: https://archive.is/zIteR
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Funny, whenever they show the CCTV footage it doesn't seem to have any sound.... Secretly recording voices is a felony is many places in 'merica.
Please stop spreading misinformation . There are so many court cases about this. A quick google will give you dozens you can read. Legally there is no “reasonable expectation of privacy” in public spaces and the only limit on that are extreme telephoto lenses looking from public spaces into private spaces. Edit: Another commenter has made me aware that some states do ban non-consensual audio recordings in public: htt…
[1] https://www.dmlp.org/legal-guide/massachusetts-recording-law
And.. its down “Blog post not found” archive link here: https://archive.is/zIteR
https://infosec.exchange/@bobdahacker/115158347003096276
The DCMA report was actually sent from response@cycle.com, and Cyble [1] appears to be a DCMA-takedown-as-a-service 'solution'.
[1]: https://cyble.com/
And.. its down “Blog post not found” archive link here: https://archive.is/zIteR
Earlier quoted context omitted.
and removed so that i don't get sued for gross misinterpretation, ignorance and misinformation spreading. What was here was a link to a California statute that is apparently misinformation somehow. Who knows, I'm just some igorant redneck apparently.
Did you read that law? It applies to “Confidential communication…carried on among the parties in the presence of one another or by means of a telegraph, telephone, or other device, except a radio”. Conversation in public is by nature not “confidential”. You are grossly misinterpreting this law and (unintentionally/ignorantly) spreading misinformation. Edit: Another commenter has made me aware that some states do ban…
You may have a smudge on your optics, mr. sniper.
One should have some reasonable means for challenging this kind of thing. But what do I know.
It’s a scary world when you know a C&D or other legal nastygram is 100% bullshit and want to ignore it, but you’re chained to a vendor that can’t respond with any level of subtlety, just the ban-hammer for everyone
So the C&Ds and nastygrams become increasingly ridiculous, but whatevs, they’re all rubber-stamped so hey corporate just push that red “lawyer” button and make my embarrassment go away real fast, before any Streisand effect can kick in!
This person seems to be fishing for a CFAA indictment?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
genuinely interested in the last known story of someone going to prison for this type of pen testing without an established bug bounty.
This story is a pen test gone wrong, so somewhat different, but illustrates some of the same failure modes. https://www.darkreading.com/vulnerabilities-threats/dark-rea...
[flagged]
I don't think it was a swipe at minimum wage employees at all, more massive corporations like Burger King making their minumum wage employees be "cheerful"
Paying someone a pittance, or anything at all, doesn't entitle you to control over their perceived mood or how they speak. You'll have to negotiate with SAG-AFTRA if you want to hire actors.