Earlier quoted context omitted.
How does it bastardize the beam? Like are there things you can do in elixir/erlang that you couldn’t with gleam?
I'm curious to know what the parent meant, as well. My understanding, which is incomplete admittedly, is that Gleam's type system lives in Gleam and isn't carried over into the produced Erlang/BEAM code, since BEAM has no concept of types, etc. Gleam also has an OTP implementation[1] available, which includes Actors and the like. My understanding is that every BEAM language must implement OTP themselves, so there's n…
Gleam's type system is the root cause of the problem. Please see my reply to the parent of your post.