Earlier quoted context omitted.
When has a dictatorship ever cared about public opinion?
When setting repressive measure to mute any opposition and skyrocketing the budget of their personal security agaisnt all raising threats?
NSF has suspended Terry Tao's grant
91–100 of 373 posts
Re: NSF has suspended Terry Tao's grant
#92Earlier quoted context omitted.
This is breaking news over the last few days. Some of the coverage https://www.ft.com/content/2fe65dbf-65a5-41f3-aaab-5661c0146...
Sure, but what kind of action does it imply? North Korea is recognized by (almost?) every country too, but that doesn't mean anyone is hurrying to provide aid to starving North Koreans. Similarly the international recognition of Azerbaijan and Armenia did nothing to prevent one from taking Nagorno-Karabach from the other earlier this year. So "recognizing the Palestinian state" is all good and well, but unless anyone…
Re: NSF has suspended Terry Tao's grant
#93I continue to find it fascinating that essentially none of the public American elite actually have any values at all. for all the whinging about "free speech" and "free markets" and "freedom from government", approximately everyone has rolled over and is publicly fine with the president ruling like a king - using laws and regulations to enrich and ennoble favoured courtiers, to punish his imaginary enemies and to des…
I do not understand this griping about rolling over when over half the nation votes for a treasonous leader. At that point, the only option left is war.
Re: NSF has suspended Terry Tao's grant
#94Public support for Israel is steadily falling; this poll was published just a couple of days ago https://news.gallup.com/poll/692948/u.s.-back-israel-militar... and other G7 countries are moving to recognise Palestine. So will the administration's push to use pro-Israel reasons to censure and penalise the universities steadily get out of touch with what the public want and sympathise with?
[flagged]
Re: NSF has suspended Terry Tao's grant
#95Background: UCLA violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, "by acting with deliberate indifference in creating a hostile educational environment for Jewish and Israeli students." Outcome: These grants are likely in a temporary holding pattern until ucla settles the issue.
> Background: UCLA violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, "by acting with deliberate indifference in creating a hostile educational environment for Jewish and Israeli students." Translation: ULCA declined to violate the First Ammendment and allowed their students and faculty to criticize Israel.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/jul/29/ucla-lawsuit...
Re: NSF has suspended Terry Tao's grant
#96Public support for Israel is steadily falling; this poll was published just a couple of days ago https://news.gallup.com/poll/692948/u.s.-back-israel-militar... and other G7 countries are moving to recognise Palestine. So will the administration's push to use pro-Israel reasons to censure and penalise the universities steadily get out of touch with what the public want and sympathise with?
Re: NSF has suspended Terry Tao's grant
#97The consequences of this Cultural Revolution will be felt for decades.
Re: NSF has suspended Terry Tao's grant
#98Re: NSF has suspended Terry Tao's grant
#99Earlier quoted context omitted.
We can thank Hitler for the exodus of academics to the US and for the creation of the Israel/Palestine issue (without the holocaust/ww2, the state would never had been made).
Yeah. We've coasted for a long time on importation of geniuses and on being the only un-bombed industrial nation ... in 1946. And now we've largely closed the door to geniuses from wealthy countries. (Why take the risk of living in the USA right now?) We've even taken the first few steps towards deliberately driving out the geniuses we have. I didn't expect that even six months ago.
Re: NSF has suspended Terry Tao's grant
#100Earlier quoted context omitted.
Do you also agree that with the same logic it makes no sense for Israel to agree to something like the right of return? Nobody else in their position would accept it.
I can certainly see why the Israelis don't want it. I would start with ending the ongoing colonisation of the West Bank and end the war in Gaza before Israel ends up any more of a pariah state than it already is. Colonisation in 2025 is a really, really bad look tbh.
And I think colonization is really the wrong term here, it's just two native populations fighting over a piece of land - not exactly a new historical concept.