Earlier quoted context omitted.
>In practice, given that much of all gold is used to store value and is not actively in use, we do not expect the need to store it for 7–17 years to be a major impediment; at worst, it means that the product will initially have somewhat less value than pure 197Au, and so some discount should be applied to the value of freshly produced gold.
You guys have a lot more faith than I do in people's ability to have rational beliefs about nuclear waste.
Maybe you wouldn't use that gold for bond wires (but they are less used now and mostly copper AFAIK).