Live data from Hacker News

I will do anything to end homelessness except build more homes (2018)

mcsweeneys.net

91–100 of 452 posts

Re: I will do anything to end homelessness except build more homes (2018)

#91
post #59
post #30

Earlier quoted context omitted.

In Dublin on 1st of February 2025 there were 1200 properties available to rent in a city of 1.5 million.

I wonder what could have happened in Dublin to use up loads of the available housing? Does anyone know?

I was told by a local while living there a major factor was Google and Meta (and others) buying out entire buildings to house their staff

Re: I will do anything to end homelessness except build more homes (2018)

#92
post #70

I know next to nothing about the US but France has 3 million unoccupied housings. https://www.insee.fr/fr/statistiques/7727384

Literally in the title of the article "... in areas of decreasing demographics ...". So yes if you are willing to live in areas : - without jobs, - without healthcare - in ghost towns

I happen to live in a rural area. Rural France is not the third world. Small towns are very much alive. Healthcare is organized around "pôles de santé". Now about jobs... that's an interesting point and probably the most important. The society as whole should favor decentralizing work. There is no point in concentrating jobs around big cities.

Re: I will do anything to end homelessness except build more homes (2018)

#93

Earlier quoted context omitted.

New housing doesn't have to be affordable for everyone. Median income goes towards old housing.

When more people are being priced out of a market than new housing units are added, then yeah they do need to be cheaper to make housing more available. The net result is more stratification, not less. Ask anyone how to make cheap housing though. No one has a convincing answer. I'm convinced that it's the right question.

Housing becomes cheaper when supply outstrips demand. That is really all there is to it. If there is induced demand due to new housing being built, you just need... more housing.

Re: I will do anything to end homelessness except build more homes (2018)

#95

This isn't everywhere. I live in Nashville and we have SO MUCH housing being built. Just apartment building after apartment building after apartment building.

It is a big problem in Democratic states like California, where the leftists (Dean Preston and other leftist NIMBYs) have allied themselves with homeowner liberals to make it impossible to build housing. Republican states like Texas do a significantly better job, as you can see by looking at annual per capita new housing, and lower rental inflation. There's a growing liberal movement to change this status quo but the…

Is "blue state" / "red state" the right distinction, or "rich area" / "poor area"? Rich people anywhere will do all they can to keep their property values from going down.

Re: I will do anything to end homelessness except build more homes (2018)

#96
post #35

Would this be considered creative non-fiction? Do you remember that teacher in school who would sometimes lash out at a poorly performing student? This made me feel like I was watching a frustrated lash out from someone who cares. Captures the author's feelings; but fails as a piece of persuasion.

It is humor. I don't watch south park to be persuaded for example.

It makes claims, even if done in a humorous manner.

It is still an argument.

Re: I will do anything to end homelessness except build more homes (2018)

#97
post #70

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Literally in the title of the article "... in areas of decreasing demographics ...". So yes if you are willing to live in areas : - without jobs, - without healthcare - in ghost towns

I happen to live in a rural area. Rural France is not the third world. Small towns are very much alive. Healthcare is organized around "pôles de santé". Now about jobs... that's an interesting point and probably the most important. The society as whole should favor decentralizing work. There is no point in concentrating jobs around big cities.

The vast majority of jobs are not decentralized and will not be for the foreseeable future. You cannot be a steelworker or waiter or actor from a home office or location that doesn't have high in-person demand for those things. There are countless reasons jobs are (and should be) concentrated around big cities. You are lucky and speaking from a position of privilege if this is not something you worry about.

Re: I will do anything to end homelessness except build more homes (2018)

#99

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How did that happen? People buy houses and then not live there like Canada? Or there is not enough people? Can I move to france and live for free pls

Sure, if you don't mind living out in the sticks :P France has a big concentration of people around the big cities with a big empty diagonal in the middle of the country, form south-west to north-east (literally called 'la diagonale du vide'). Not only are you far from anything resembling a city, but infra for public & private transport are lacking. So if you can wfh and find a place with good 4g/5g coverage, and you…

Sounds about perfect where do I sign up.

Re: I will do anything to end homelessness except build more homes (2018)

#100
post #75

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is a scapegoat at best in areas with high homelessness. The mentally ill and drug abusers are the most visible part of the homeless population not all the homeless population. There are also complex relations to cause vs effect where mental illness may be at manageable levels until a crisis like homelessness exacerbates it or drug use may be a result of being homeless instead of a cause.

The mentally ill and drug abusers are also the ones who need to be dealt with in a way totally separate from those who are struggling but trying to get back on their feet and need a place to shower and sleep safely. They cause disproportionate damage to cities and the cause of aiding homeless itself. It's asinine to conflate the two issues and waffle back and forth between "more houses" and nimby name-calling. Neithe…

And yet it works almost flawlessly everywhere it's been tried. But sure, the US is different, special. That's always the argument, right?
Post reply on HN