Live data from Hacker News

Snorting the AGI with Claude Code

kadekillary.work

91–100 of 253 posts

Re: Snorting the AGI with Claude Code

#91
post #89

I’m biased [0], but I think we should be scripting around LLM-agnostic open source agents. This technology is changing software development at its foundations—-we need to ensure we continue to control how we work. [0] https://github.com/all-hands-ai/openhands

This 10000%

Re: Snorting the AGI with Claude Code

#92
post #89

I’m biased [0], but I think we should be scripting around LLM-agnostic open source agents. This technology is changing software development at its foundations—-we need to ensure we continue to control how we work. [0] https://github.com/all-hands-ai/openhands

But what do we do if the closed models are just better?

Re: Snorting the AGI with Claude Code

#93
post #89

I’m biased [0], but I think we should be scripting around LLM-agnostic open source agents. This technology is changing software development at its foundations—-we need to ensure we continue to control how we work. [0] https://github.com/all-hands-ai/openhands

But what do we do if the closed models are just better?

Wait?

Re: Snorting the AGI with Claude Code

#95

The terminal really is sort of the perfect interface for an LLM; I wonder whether this approach will become favored over the custom IDE integrations.

What??? It’s literally the worst interface Do you not want to edit your code after it’s generated?

...if your IDE doesn't have a terminal then it isn't an IDE.

Re: Snorting the AGI with Claude Code

#96

On the one hand very cool. On the other hand, every time people are just spinning off sub-agents I am reminded of this: https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/kpPnReyBC54KESiSn/optimality... It's simultaneously the obvious next step and portends a potentially very dangerous future.

Am I the only one who saw in the prompt: > ${SUGESTION} And recognized it wouldn't do anything because of a typo? Alas, my kind is not long for this world...

I noticed it and then scrolled through looking for the place where they called it out... sadly disappointed but I don't know what I expected from lesswrong

Re: Snorting the AGI with Claude Code

#97
post #89

I’m biased [0], but I think we should be scripting around LLM-agnostic open source agents. This technology is changing software development at its foundations—-we need to ensure we continue to control how we work. [0] https://github.com/all-hands-ai/openhands

But what do we do if the closed models are just better?

Steal from them shamelessly, the same way they stole from everyone else?

Re: Snorting the AGI with Claude Code

#99
Not trying to be rude here, but that `last_week.md` is horrible to me. I can't imagine having to read that let alone listen to the computer say it to me. It's so much blah blah and fluff that reads like a bad PR piece. I'd much rather scan through commits of the last week.

I've found this generally with AI summaries...usually their writing style is terrible, and I feel like I cannot really trust them to get the facts right, and reading the original text is often faster and better.

Re: Snorting the AGI with Claude Code

#100
I played around with agents yesterday, now I'm hooked.

I got Claude Code (With CLine and VSCode) to do a task for a personal project. It did it about 5x faster than i'd have been able to do manually including running bash commands e.g. to install dependencies for new npm packages.

These things can do real work. If you have things in plain text format like markdown, csv spreadsheets etc, alot of what normal human employees do today could be somewhat automated.

You currently still need a human to supervise the agent and what its doing, but that won't be needed anymore in the not so distant future.

Post reply on HN