I’m biased [0], but I think we should be scripting around LLM-agnostic open source agents. This technology is changing software development at its foundations—-we need to ensure we continue to control how we work. [0] https://github.com/all-hands-ai/openhands
Snorting the AGI with Claude Code
91–100 of 253 posts
Re: Snorting the AGI with Claude Code
#92I’m biased [0], but I think we should be scripting around LLM-agnostic open source agents. This technology is changing software development at its foundations—-we need to ensure we continue to control how we work. [0] https://github.com/all-hands-ai/openhands
Re: Snorting the AGI with Claude Code
#93I’m biased [0], but I think we should be scripting around LLM-agnostic open source agents. This technology is changing software development at its foundations—-we need to ensure we continue to control how we work. [0] https://github.com/all-hands-ai/openhands
But what do we do if the closed models are just better?
Re: Snorting the AGI with Claude Code
#94Re: Snorting the AGI with Claude Code
#95The terminal really is sort of the perfect interface for an LLM; I wonder whether this approach will become favored over the custom IDE integrations.
What??? It’s literally the worst interface Do you not want to edit your code after it’s generated?
Re: Snorting the AGI with Claude Code
#96On the one hand very cool. On the other hand, every time people are just spinning off sub-agents I am reminded of this: https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/kpPnReyBC54KESiSn/optimality... It's simultaneously the obvious next step and portends a potentially very dangerous future.
Am I the only one who saw in the prompt: > ${SUGESTION} And recognized it wouldn't do anything because of a typo? Alas, my kind is not long for this world...
Re: Snorting the AGI with Claude Code
#97I’m biased [0], but I think we should be scripting around LLM-agnostic open source agents. This technology is changing software development at its foundations—-we need to ensure we continue to control how we work. [0] https://github.com/all-hands-ai/openhands
But what do we do if the closed models are just better?
Re: Snorting the AGI with Claude Code
#98Re: Snorting the AGI with Claude Code
#99I've found this generally with AI summaries...usually their writing style is terrible, and I feel like I cannot really trust them to get the facts right, and reading the original text is often faster and better.
Re: Snorting the AGI with Claude Code
#100I got Claude Code (With CLine and VSCode) to do a task for a personal project. It did it about 5x faster than i'd have been able to do manually including running bash commands e.g. to install dependencies for new npm packages.
These things can do real work. If you have things in plain text format like markdown, csv spreadsheets etc, alot of what normal human employees do today could be somewhat automated.
You currently still need a human to supervise the agent and what its doing, but that won't be needed anymore in the not so distant future.